Author Topic: E=MC2, not any more  (Read 5922 times)

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #20 on: 18 November 2011, 22:27 »
E=MC2 is WRONG because 0 + 1 = 0.

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #21 on: 19 November 2011, 07:15 »
E=MC2 is WRONG because 0 + 1 = 0.

thats it!! it all makes sense now  :smiley:

Offline cняis

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,034
  • Know there's something burning over there...
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #22 on: 19 November 2011, 08:14 »
Wait for the God squad to arrive as disprove all your theories  :evil:


I don't think a semi will give the same results

Offline The Mighty Elvi

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,449
  • I'm better than you today.
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #23 on: 19 November 2011, 08:18 »
« Last Edit: 19 November 2011, 08:22 by The Mighty Elvi »

Offline gibby

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,675
  • Champions of Europe,ooh ,just the five times then!
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #24 on: 19 November 2011, 15:16 »
I don't get why 0 + 1 = 0 :huh:

Example, I have 0 £s in my bank account, I then find £1 on the floor, I put that in my bank account so I now have £1. So 0 + 1 = 1 surely ? Or am I missing something ? :grin:
......now officially dubless.

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #25 on: 19 November 2011, 15:17 »
Missed it. Ask Lenda how 0+1=1 :grin:
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline gibby

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,675
  • Champions of Europe,ooh ,just the five times then!
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #26 on: 19 November 2011, 15:24 »
Ah, if Len said it then it must be true. :rolleyes:

Any links ?
......now officially dubless.

Offline Mr Blue

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,133
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #27 on: 19 November 2011, 15:28 »
I don't get why 0 + 1 = 0 :huh:

Example, I have 0 £s in my bank account, I then find £1 on the floor, I put that in my bank account so I now have £1. So 0 + 1 = 1 surely ? Or am I missing something ? :grin:

exactly.

Sod this speed of light crap. What a waste of money. i have far more important things to sort.  :rolleyes:
:)

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #28 on: 19 November 2011, 15:40 »
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline cняis

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,034
  • Know there's something burning over there...
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #29 on: 19 November 2011, 19:26 »


I don't think a semi will give the same results