Author Topic: Windows 8 Boot time  (Read 2498 times)

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Windows 8 Boot time
« on: 16 September 2011, 22:56 »
for those that missed it

Now considering this is pre-beta code, it's damned quick :evil:
Enjoying using it on a virtual machine at work, but need to use it on a real machine NOW :evil:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5z_WPsxsUU

Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline DubFan

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,437
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #1 on: 16 September 2011, 23:03 »
Quick, but that shows nothing.
How do I know that that is the desktop thats loaded? It could just be a quickly coded image.


Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #2 on: 16 September 2011, 23:08 »
errr it is the real deal, Microsoft wouldn't put that out there if it weren't can you imagine the black lash if it were faked?

Trust me on this, having run it in virtual machines it's quick too boot not that quick but I've not given it much resources :grin:

Full explanation here if you are bored.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/08/delivering-fast-boot-times-in-windows-8.aspx
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline golf-sib

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,652
  • Турботазик
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #3 on: 16 September 2011, 23:11 »
Thy hid the 9ghz overclock and nitrogen cooling there  :grin: :grin: :grin:

I don't understand what boot time has got to do as a performance benchmark, just a marketing gimmick... Bring back XP  :grin:


Audi TT - K04 TFSI Hybrid - 325BHP
VW Golf - k03 AGU - 200BHP

1.8T AGU..
R135
╚╬╬╝
  24


My Chinese Bike project: http://xtrsproject.wordpress.com/

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #4 on: 16 September 2011, 23:15 »
 :grin:

Nah I prefer the new Blue Screen of Death, XP's was SOOOO last decade :grin:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=271674969519070&set=pu.184357191584182&type=1&theater

 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline DubFan

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,437
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #5 on: 16 September 2011, 23:20 »
errr it is the real deal, Microsoft wouldn't put that out there if it weren't can you imagine the black lash if it were faked?

I don't doubt you. Stuff is always available to MSDN subscribers really early.

But that video is not on a Microsoft website, or even on a MS youtube channel. There's little in there to prove authenticity.

Bootup time is only important really for laptop and netbook users who will be turning their PCs off and back on frequently as they move from place to place.
What they would be better devoting time to is making windows run better without hogging resources.


Offline golf-sib

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,652
  • Турботазик
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #6 on: 16 September 2011, 23:22 »
Looks good whats the red one look like  :grin: :grin: :grin:

I miss xp, too me thats when MS got it right, but they are cutting back on so much support for it such as the live services. Hate all this ribbon interface etc... I understand they are aiming for the touch screen market, but they are not appealing to my 32" desktop with flight simulators  :grin:


Audi TT - K04 TFSI Hybrid - 325BHP
VW Golf - k03 AGU - 200BHP

1.8T AGU..
R135
╚╬╬╝
  24


My Chinese Bike project: http://xtrsproject.wordpress.com/

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #7 on: 16 September 2011, 23:33 »
errr it is the real deal, Microsoft wouldn't put that out there if it weren't can you imagine the black lash if it were faked?

I don't doubt you. Stuff is always available to MSDN subscribers really early.

But that video is not on a Microsoft website, or even on a MS youtube channel. There's little in there to prove authenticity.

Bootup time is only important really for laptop and netbook users who will be turning their PCs off and back on frequently as they move from place to place.
What they would be better devoting time to is making windows run better without hogging resources.

If you have a look on the MSDN link I posted you'll see the video there :wink: Doing this people can save battery life on the laptop/tablets by powering down when they don't need them on and have the benefit of quick boots  :wink:

It's also available to ANYONE who goes to dev.windows.com and wants to download 1 of 3 ISO's ( I recommend the 64 bit with Dev tools ISO, around 4.8Gb but has all the tools and the Metro apps work, whereas the 32bit ISO the apps don't work, actually here's the link http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/apps/br229516/

Win8 is also going to need less resources or equal to that Win7 machines, most likely less from what I've read.


I understand they are aiming for the touch screen market, but they are not appealing to my 32" desktop with flight simulators  :grin:

Good thing you can access the normal Windows 7 like interface then and disable the ribbon in explorer :wink:
« Last Edit: 16 September 2011, 23:49 by Jay »
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline golf-sib

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,652
  • Турботазик
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #8 on: 16 September 2011, 23:39 »
Surely Sleep/hibernate is a better idea than contiguous boot on/offs though?

Whats happened to the RSOD


Audi TT - K04 TFSI Hybrid - 325BHP
VW Golf - k03 AGU - 200BHP

1.8T AGU..
R135
╚╬╬╝
  24


My Chinese Bike project: http://xtrsproject.wordpress.com/

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: Windows 8 Boot time
« Reply #9 on: 16 September 2011, 23:47 »
Full power downs aren't any more or less better than the other, personal preference at the end of the day. Not seen a RSOD in many many years, I had to do a search for it to refresh my memory even then I think it was only pics I had seen because I've never had a RSOD myself :grin:
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.