Poll

Strikes. Are you with them or not?

Yes they should strike.
9 (18.8%)
No they should crack on working and stop moaning
39 (81.3%)

Total Members Voted: 47

Voting closed: 01 July 2011, 10:18

Author Topic: Strikes. Are you with them or not?  (Read 11366 times)

Offline golf newbie

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #10 on: 30 June 2011, 11:32 »
Have a look at MP`s pensions..

Remember kids we in this together.. :lipsrsealed:

Offline Jimp

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,321
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #11 on: 30 June 2011, 11:50 »
Not happy at work, so you stop working? If I was in charge I'd sack them and find someone who wants a job. It was wasted time in the 70s and it's wasted time now. Only difference is that the time wasted now is more crucial than before.
I'm speaking in general terms though. I don't know who is striking in the uk at the moment.
Not low enough mk5
Not on the road enough mk3

Offline dansmk3

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
  • FULL TIME JUNGLIST
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #12 on: 30 June 2011, 11:55 »
Don't get me started on the Tories  :angry:

As for the strike,I'm all for it.
My mum's a teacher and people don't realise how difficult it can be.
What I hate is how low and medium paid civil servants pay has been frozen, yet the bankers that caused the trouble got bailed out and are now getting bonuses again!

i dont want to stick up for the bankers really i dont as i hate the lot of them however, alot of people really do not know what the bankers do and go through each day.
my old man is a network manager for a bank on the financial markets side, without him trade cant take place if there is a problem with the computers and networks, he is on call 24/7 and his bonuses got stopped and pay freeze included. i know he aint your stereotypical "banker" but he was affected too and in all majority of the workers do put a sh1t load of hours into their work, we need to focus on the MD's and CEO's of banks that dont do anything but get stoopid bonuses

if the workersz didnt do as much they wouldnt expect half as much of a bonus! well thats what iv heard around the offices anyway lol


Offline Ant1981

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,601
  • Feed me, prod me
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #13 on: 30 June 2011, 12:08 »
I can't strike. If I don't like it I could always leave.
80% of your posts are total tripe, as they are mostly replies to sh1te posts created by the morons that, unfortunately this forum attracts.

'02 VW Golf 1.8 GTi Turbo - 186,000 miles
'09 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R
1990 VW Golf GTi 16V - Gone but not forgotten
Currently considering next car

Offline Komenda

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 632
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #14 on: 30 June 2011, 12:12 »
People seem to be missing the whole point of this. At the moment the public sector all get to retire with a cushy pension at 61 while us private sector bods, (who bolster their pensions) get to work a nice 5 years longer (8 years very soon). They are striking because they will have to work as long as everyone else.

IMO they are f**king work shy parasites.

Edit - and as for teachers, 13 weeks holiday a year, they need lining up and beating very hard with a common sense stick.
« Last Edit: 30 June 2011, 12:14 by Komenda »

Offline simonpolly

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,383
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #15 on: 30 June 2011, 12:35 »
People seem to be missing the whole point of this. At the moment the public sector all get to retire with a cushy pension at 61 while us private sector bods, (who bolster their pensions) get to work a nice 5 years longer (8 years very soon). They are striking because they will have to work as long as everyone else.

IMO they are f**king work shy parasites.

Edit - and as for teachers, 13 weeks holiday a year, they need lining up and beating very hard with a common sense stick.

Well said,the goverment are only asking them to do the same as most private sector workers had to do years ago.
i.e give up final salary pensions,pay more into your own pension
« Last Edit: 30 June 2011, 12:37 by simonpolly »
Golfgti build quality is average at best.

Offline spear

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #16 on: 30 June 2011, 13:06 »
People seem to be missing the whole point of this. At the moment the public sector all get to retire with a cushy pension at 61 while us private sector bods, (who bolster their pensions) get to work a nice 5 years longer (8 years very soon). They are striking because they will have to work as long as everyone else.

IMO they are f**king work shy parasites.

Edit - and as for teachers, 13 weeks holiday a year, they need lining up and beating very hard with a common sense stick.

tw*t

Offline Komenda

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 632
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #17 on: 30 June 2011, 13:06 »
People seem to be missing the whole point of this. At the moment the public sector all get to retire with a cushy pension at 61 while us private sector bods, (who bolster their pensions) get to work a nice 5 years longer (8 years very soon). They are striking because they will have to work as long as everyone else.

IMO they are f**king work shy parasites.

Edit - and as for teachers, 13 weeks holiday a year, they need lining up and beating very hard with a common sense stick.

twit

Constructive response, care to elaborate.

Offline dom

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,084
  • Back in a Mk4
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #18 on: 30 June 2011, 13:10 »
People seem to be missing the whole point of this. At the moment the public sector all get to retire with a cushy pension at 61 while us private sector bods, (who bolster their pensions) get to work a nice 5 years longer (8 years very soon). They are striking because they will have to work as long as everyone else.

IMO they are f**king work shy parasites.

Edit - and as for teachers, 13 weeks holiday a year, they need lining up and beating very hard with a common sense stick.

tw*t

Agreed :wink:

Offline dom

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,084
  • Back in a Mk4
Re: Strikes. Are you with them or not?
« Reply #19 on: 30 June 2011, 13:13 »
Taken from another site:

Teachers are paid too much!! I'm fed up with teachers and their hefty salaries for only 9 months work! What we need here is a little perspective. If I had my way, I'd pay teachers babysitting wages.

That's right... instead of paying these outrageous taxes, I'd give them £3. 00 an hour. And, I'm only going to pay them for 5 hours, not planning time. That would be £15. 00 a day. Each parent should pay £15. 00 a day for these teachers to baby sit their children. Even if they have more than one child, it's still cheaper than private daycare.

Now how many children do they teach a day--maybe 20? That's £15.00 x 20 = 300.00 a day. But remember, they only work 180 days a year! I'm not going to pay them for all the holidays: £300.00 x 180 =£54,000. (Just a minute my calculator must need batteries.)

What will teachers say about those who have 10 years of experience and a master's degree? Well, maybe (just to be fair) they could get the minimum wage. We can round that off to about £6.00 an hour, times 5 hours, times 20 children. £6.00 x 5 x 20. That's £600 a day times 180 days. That's only £108,000.

Wait a minute... there is something wrong here...