hey im new, blonde and have an issue with my mk3

[trog_nfs]

no doubt i can get these at the scrappy!

Where all Mk3s belong.

You mean where all the mk2s are already?

[LowlifeDubber]

no doubt i can get these at the scrappy!

Where all Mk3s belong.

Why dont you f*ck off into a different section then you complete retard?

Shame your in Wales boyo as i would do you a swap for my keep fit window mechs.
Gimme a shout when theyre out and if you dont remove them with a hammer i will buy them off you
Ive got my loom just need switches and im away.

Might have switches at some point. Also might have regulators and motors, won't know til I do mine soon. Fingers croased it works this time! Third loom! The other two were 5 door tho.

Sweet let me know dude
Im getting rid of a load of mk3 stuff atm so let me know if you require anything.

[Gash]

The quickest solution I can think of is this:

Ooooh, a photo of the aerodynamic model of the Mk3.

got to love this, coming from a guy who owns a mk4 which is slower fatter and bigger than a mk3

[trog_nfs]

The quickest solution I can think of is this:

Ooooh, a photo of the aerodynamic model of the Mk3.

got to love this, coming from a guy who owns a mk4 which is slower fatter and bigger than a mk3

Cd.A is the drag coefficient x frontal area, and gives a better idea of aerodynamics than just Cd.

Mk 1 Cd.A = 0.83
Mk 2 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 3 Cd.A = 0.66
Mk 4 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 5 Cd.A = 0.76

I think you'll find the mk3 is less brick like than the mk2 and mk4.

[dansmk3]

The quickest solution I can think of is this:

Ooooh, a photo of the aerodynamic model of the Mk3.

got to love this, coming from a guy who owns a mk4 which is slower fatter and bigger than a mk3

Cd.A is the drag coefficient x frontal area, and gives a better idea of aerodynamics than just Cd.

Mk 1 Cd.A = 0.83
Mk 2 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 3 Cd.A = 0.66
Mk 4 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 5 Cd.A = 0.76

I think you'll find the mk3 is less brick like than the mk2 and mk4.

OWNED hahahahha

[LowlifeDubber]

Cd.A is the drag coefficient x frontal area, and gives a better idea of aerodynamics than just Cd.

Mk 1 Cd.A = 0.83
Mk 2 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 3 Cd.A = 0.66
Mk 4 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 5 Cd.A = 0.76

I think you'll find the mk3 is less brick like than the mk2 and mk4.

Post of the year

[Ant1981]

The quickest solution I can think of is this:

Ooooh, a photo of the aerodynamic model of the Mk3.

got to love this, coming from a guy who owns a mk4 which is slower fatter and bigger than a mk3

Cd.A is the drag coefficient x frontal area, and gives a better idea of aerodynamics than just Cd.

Mk 1 Cd.A = 0.83
Mk 2 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 3 Cd.A = 0.66
Mk 4 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 5 Cd.A = 0.76

I think you'll find the mk3 is less brick like than the mk2 and mk4.

Brilliant (although the MK2 was alot faster than the MK3). I'm going to buy a MK3 VR6 in that case.

[Ant1981]

The quickest solution I can think of is this:

Ooooh, a photo of the aerodynamic model of the Mk3.

got to love this, coming from a guy who owns a mk4 which is slower fatter and bigger than a mk3

Cd.A is the drag coefficient x frontal area, and gives a better idea of aerodynamics than just Cd.

Mk 1 Cd.A = 0.83
Mk 2 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 3 Cd.A = 0.66
Mk 4 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 5 Cd.A = 0.76

I think you'll find the mk3 is less brick like than the mk2 and mk4.

OWNED hahahahha

Owned? Are you like, 12? 

[dansmk3]

The quickest solution I can think of is this:

Ooooh, a photo of the aerodynamic model of the Mk3.

yup, quite clearly i am 12

do us a favour and get yaself a more aerodynamic car than your current breeze-block! then come back and comment! 

got to love this, coming from a guy who owns a mk4 which is slower fatter and bigger than a mk3

Cd.A is the drag coefficient x frontal area, and gives a better idea of aerodynamics than just Cd.

Mk 1 Cd.A = 0.83
Mk 2 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 3 Cd.A = 0.66
Mk 4 Cd.A = 0.70
Mk 5 Cd.A = 0.76

I think you'll find the mk3 is less brick like than the mk2 and mk4.

OWNED hahahahha

Owned? Are you like, 12? 

yup, clearly i am 12!

do us all a favour and come back and comment when you have gotten rid of your breeze-block and got an actual aero-dynamic car!!

nuff said??? 

[Ant1981]

What like an F1 car? Those figures, a MK3 isn't realisically any more aerodynamic than a MK4 (certainly not as a road car) and they're certainly not quicker.

I could ask an engineering officer at work about this, he's qualified to DR. level in aerodynamics, but as soon as I mention MK3, I don't think he'll be at all interested.