Ok I'd like to join in on this discussion.
The first point is the 'pro' question of journalists.
Journalists are pros however they are pros at writing magazines and perhaps not at serious and reliable vehicle performance documentation. At the end of the day the magazine only wants to sell as many copies as possible. Creating a reputation for reliability and accuracy is certainly a way to encourage readers to keep buying but so is a good juicy read. Stating that a car as well known as the GTI is developing a good bit more power is a good way to get in more readers.
Secondly,
Hi all, I've read a few reviews from mags and online mags that have tested standard BHP of stock MK6 GTI's and they have all reported higher than the 210 BHP specified by VW. One tested on their Dyno 249BHP!
I'd be interested in the results on this forum of those who have stuck their cars on the dyno.
Cheers,
Jim
I'm not trying to get into an argument here but two well established motoring magazines have performed tests and their comments are in my post for all to see.
At some point people have to accept the pro's views. You could use your own argument to suggest that figures used for your BHP test could be wrong........
Again i'm not looking for an argument just repeating what I have seen in some well respected motoring mags.....
It does sound like you have your own mind made up about whether or not you want to believe the magazines.
That is all for now
