Author Topic: big or small ? (Read 2813 times)

raferackstraw · « **Reply #10 on:** 23 October 2010, 21:29 »

small for me cos the 89 16v i had back in the day had them

small bumper = less weight always a good thing

xkaty_h · « **Reply #11 on:** 23 October 2010, 21:38 »

Big bumper for me.

I think they look odd with small bumpers.

Mikesps · « **Reply #12 on:** 24 October 2010, 09:34 »

Big bumper. Just looks better imo

lemski · « **Reply #13 on:** 09 November 2010, 20:56 »

Who would put big bumpers on a early golf

tsr_adi · « **Reply #14 on:** 09 November 2010, 22:05 »

factory for me, but I prefer smalls, they suit the "age" of the design. But imo all alpine white mk2s should be small bumpered

luke · « **Reply #15 on:** 09 November 2010, 22:13 »

I like big bumpers, but then I also like small bumpers, FIGHT!

Diamond Hell · « **Reply #16 on:** 09 November 2010, 22:36 »

small bumper = less weight always a good thing

I think you may find you are wrong.

I can't vote - there is no Andywash option.

Peej1981 · « **Reply #17 on:** 10 November 2010, 08:15 »

Big bumpers for me but that is cause i have them on mine and think they look better then the small ones, they make the mk2 look a lot fatter.

Ninja · « **Reply #18 on:** 10 November 2010, 10:11 »

Old style - small. Mirrors look out of place otherwise.

90Spec - Big. It's the only way.

My 89 Had big ones fitted. Looked the dogs.

tsr_adi · « **Reply #19 on:** 10 November 2010, 16:52 »

I reckon big bumpers nly look right if the arches and skirts are fitted, otherwise they look out of place. You know who you are mk2 driver owners

GolfGTIforum.co.uk