Quote from: SoundillusioN on 12 October 2010, 12:49Quote from: gti3_elston on 12 October 2010, 12:28Quote from: A7 UFO on 12 October 2010, 12:20are you sure it wasn't a diesel? It still would have been quicker than you.i think so mate lol, these mk3 16v's are under powered!here we go!!! lol, typical mk2 pub talk, ive owned 3 mk2 16v`s , thats why ive now got a mk3 lmao, meeeow!!
Quote from: gti3_elston on 12 October 2010, 12:28Quote from: A7 UFO on 12 October 2010, 12:20are you sure it wasn't a diesel? It still would have been quicker than you.i think so mate lol, these mk3 16v's are under powered!
Quote from: A7 UFO on 12 October 2010, 12:20are you sure it wasn't a diesel? It still would have been quicker than you.i think so mate lol, these mk3 16v's are under powered!
are you sure it wasn't a diesel? It still would have been quicker than you.
Quote from: SoundillusioN on 12 October 2010, 12:49Quote from: gti3_elston on 12 October 2010, 12:28Quote from: A7 UFO on 12 October 2010, 12:20are you sure it wasn't a diesel? It still would have been quicker than you.i think so mate lol, these mk3 16v's are under powered!here we go!!! lol, typical mk2 pub talk, ive owned 3 mk2 16v`s , thats why ive now got a mk3 wish it was a mk1 though lmao, meeeow!!
thats it!!! but with old age comes wisdom,lol
Quote from: jonnygti66 on 12 October 2010, 13:38thats it!!! but with old age comes wisdom,lol and incontinence
But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.
