Poll

Which would you prefer?

197 bhp(re-mapped) 130 diesel?
3 (60%)
180 bhp petrol
2 (40%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Voting closed: 19 December 2004, 16:15

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Gt tdi  (Read 1524 times)

Offline Picarssopainter

  • Just got here
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Gt tdi
« on: 16 December 2004, 16:15 »
I'd say the diesel's mpg and torque wins every time!  :wink:
Logged

Offline jv

  • Administrator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,223
Re: Gt tdi
« Reply #1 on: 16 December 2004, 17:30 »
remap the petrol one instead  :laugh:

in a mk3 then?  :tongue:
Logged
Buy site stuff!
GolfGTI.co.uk - merchandise

Support the forum charity!
Forum Charity

Offline topher

  • Administrator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,594
  • fully functioning
Re: Gt tdi
« Reply #2 on: 16 December 2004, 17:31 »
would these not be MK4's ? :huh: .. and it'll take more than a remap to get 197bhp from a PD130 :grin:
Logged

Offline Overseer

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,690
Re: Gt tdi
« Reply #3 on: 16 December 2004, 17:33 »
*cough* tractor *cough*
Logged
Used to have a '97 MK3 16v GTI 3dr in 'Black Magic'... now have a '55 Civic Type-S...

mrwotto

  • Guest
Re: Gt tdi
« Reply #4 on: 16 December 2004, 19:29 »
I wud go for the oil burner if it is possible, be far better on the mpg :grin:
Logged

Offline actionslax

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: Gt tdi
« Reply #5 on: 17 December 2004, 14:13 »
i think i'd be with the 'tractor' on this one.. :grin:  my mate has a mkIV tractor anniversary with a engine remap -185bhp i think and the torque is unbelievable and he stiills gets 40+ mpg with ragging it....
Logged


currently rattling:
1. To make or emit a quick succession of short percussive sounds.
2. Not anymore - Now rumbling

mrwotto

  • Guest
Re: Gt tdi
« Reply #6 on: 17 December 2004, 16:02 »
40mpg I wish i could get that out of my 16valver when i am ragging it :D
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »