Author Topic: £37 for covering 164 miles?  (Read 2191 times)

Offline Cable

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
Re: £37 for covering 164 miles?
« Reply #10 on: 12 March 2010, 08:04 »
I can get 100miles to £10 with motorway driving with the 16v 

Offline Nino

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,626
Re: £37 for covering 164 miles?
« Reply #11 on: 12 March 2010, 08:56 »
In my golf i filled my tank and only got about 267 miles town driving  :cry:

Like my badge? Get one here: https://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=291134.0
VW Car history - Mk3 1.8 GL - Silver - 5 door, Mk4 1.8t - Silver - 3 door, Mk4 R32 - Black - 5 door, Mk5 GTi - Black - 5 door, Mk4 R32 - Deep Pearl Blue - 3 door, MK6 2.0 TDI - Graphite Blue - 5 door, MK7 GTD - Solid Black - 5 door.
Current - MK6 GTi Edition 35 - Candy White - 3 door

Offline LazyLunatic

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,153
  • MK3 20VT Project
Re: £37 for covering 164 miles?
« Reply #12 on: 12 March 2010, 10:07 »
town driving i get 20-25mpg and on a run its about 30. If i want to have fun, its a lot less :D

i thought something was wrong but it was just me adjusting from a bottomless tank in a 1.5td van :D

Offline thai-wronghorse

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,325
  • mk1 Seat Leon FR TDI
Re: £37 for covering 164 miles?
« Reply #13 on: 12 March 2010, 23:29 »
I most definitely agree with the lower half of the fuel tank seeming to drop significantly quickly than the top half....poxy gauges . senders.

Offline FlySpeck

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
Re: £37 for covering 164 miles?
« Reply #14 on: 13 March 2010, 14:44 »
its the shape of the tank.

Its curved and narrower at the bottom, and flat on top, so the lower half has a steeper height-to-volume drop that the top half which is pretty square dimensioned so it drops evenly. Like a bowl....the bottom half has less in it than the top half.


Offline thai-wronghorse

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,325
  • mk1 Seat Leon FR TDI
Re: £37 for covering 164 miles?
« Reply #15 on: 13 March 2010, 19:13 »
That in my eyes makes it sh!t then as you'd have thought that VW would have taken that into consideration when designing the fuel gauge sender??

Offline FlySpeck

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
Re: £37 for covering 164 miles?
« Reply #16 on: 13 March 2010, 20:54 »
I agree mate.

unfortunately they all use a float-driven variable resistor so "level" is still "level", but under a constant flow, the resistance values of the sender as it goes from full to empty can only follow the top surface of the fuel, and as you can see a round bottomed tank will not give a linear reading from top to bottom as the curved lower part has less volume.

I would have thought a better idea would be a load sensor / strain-gauge that measured the weight of the fuel in the tank - and could exactly display the tank contents to the millilitre as fuel has a known weight, like water does, due to its specific gravity value.

The strain gauge could be mounted in a small depression in the bottom centre of the tank so it gets a pretty constant reading.

:cool: