Author Topic: Super or Unleaded. (again)  (Read 7432 times)

Offline GolfTi

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,921
  • ..gotta feel for my automobile..
Super or Unleaded. (again)
« on: 14 September 2009, 20:32 »
I know this has been covered before but quite a few of you have your mk6 GTI now and maybe have some new comments.

What fuel are you using and have you noticed any difference between 95 and 98/99 RON?
Mk7 GTI. DBP, DCC, Winter pack. Mine since new, July 2013.
GTI no. 4. Golf no. 5.  VW no. 7.

Offline simonpolly

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,383
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #1 on: 14 September 2009, 20:54 »
95 here
Golfgti build quality is average at best.

Offline howlingmoon

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 377
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #2 on: 14 September 2009, 21:01 »
I have only been using 95ron here in the Netherlands... actually I have yet to see anything above 95 here... I use Shell exclusively...
GTI Mk6 United Grey, 18" Monza Shadows, RNS310, Executive Package, ACC

Offline gizzywizzy

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,952
  • Black is definitely the stealthiest colour!!
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #3 on: 14 September 2009, 21:48 »
I use 95 ron but that is only because none of the 2 garages where I live sells anything else.  But the car seems fine on it, that is when I am able to drive it!!
Deep Black Pearl Mk7 GT TDI 150.

Offline FroGTI

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,268
  • Wheel nut
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #4 on: 15 September 2009, 07:55 »
I've tried both 95 and 98, but TBH I can't say I've noticed any difference in terms of power gain/loss. However, for some strange reason, I noticed yesterday that my average fuel consumption seems to have suddenly dropped from about 8 to 7 litres/100km (35 to 40 mpg). I have done 1800km, or about 1100 miles :huh:

Offline GolfTi

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,921
  • ..gotta feel for my automobile..
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #5 on: 15 September 2009, 09:01 »
I've tried both 95 and 98, but TBH I can't say I've noticed any difference in terms of power gain/loss. However, for some strange reason, I noticed yesterday that my average fuel consumption seems to have suddenly dropped from about 8 to 7 litres/100km (35 to 40 mpg). I have done 1800km, or about 1100 miles :huh:

FroGTI

Was this drop in consumption due to a change in fuel type?
Mk7 GTI. DBP, DCC, Winter pack. Mine since new, July 2013.
GTI no. 4. Golf no. 5.  VW no. 7.

Offline matchboy

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,160
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #6 on: 15 September 2009, 09:11 »
just sticking with 95, that's what it says on the cap so that's what i'm gonna use.  use to use 98 and 95 on my mk 5 and never noticed the difference in either power or consumption so not bothering with the mk 6 - as it is petrol is 108p at the mo so i'm not paying super prices!!
Audi RS5 2018
Gone: BMW M4 LCI Competition Package
Previous: Mk 3 Audi TTS, Porsche 981 Cayman S, Mk 7 Golf R, Mk 7 GTI, Mk 6 GTI, Mk 5 GTI and so on....

Offline DL

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #7 on: 15 September 2009, 09:57 »
I use 95 ron as well mostly because of the reasons Matchboy stated but also because I read that it has ben designed to run on 95ron. Not sure where that came from, might even have been someone on here.

Offline AlanD

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 9,946
  • MK5 2.0T 16v
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #8 on: 15 September 2009, 10:13 »
Yeah, it was TT that explained that the new 2.0T engine has been improved and can now run at optimum levels on just 95 stuff (unlike the MK5s 2.0T engine).

Filled up Sunday night with V-Power . . . . 114.9 :( :( :( :(

Offline FroGTI

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,268
  • Wheel nut
Re: Super or Unleaded. (again)
« Reply #9 on: 15 September 2009, 11:39 »
FroGTI

Was this drop in consumption due to a change in fuel type?

Not as far as I am aware. It was more as if the computer suddenly decided that the engine was run in and decided it could use less fuel. I had a similar experience on a new car a couple of years ago, but I can't remember which one it was (I change cars a lot) :smiley: