Author Topic: uh oh! Previous MOT history  (Read 8025 times)

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
uh oh! Previous MOT history
« on: 10 June 2009, 16:14 »
check this out:


Date of test:   22/08/2008
Certificate issue refused (Fail)
Odometer reading:   124,280 Miles
Test number:   
Test station name:   MCS GARAGE SERVICES UK LTD
Test station number:   
Test station telephone number:   
Test class:   IV
Reason(s) for refusal to issue Certificate
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Steering system has excessive free play detected at the steering wheel (steering rack fitted) (2.2.A.1b)
Power steering component(s) leaking (2.3.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre(s) is incorrect because different size tyres are fitted on the same axle. (4.1.A.1a)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.3)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Nearside Rear Rear brake binding (3.7.A.5a)
Offside Rear Rear brake binding (3.7.A.5a)
Advisory Notice issued
Nearside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.3)
Offside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.3)


Not good, cos:

Date of test:   28/11/2008
Certificate issued (Pass)
Odometer reading:   124,290 Miles
Test number:   
Test station name:   MCS GARAGE SERVICES UK LTD
Test station number:   
Test station telephone number:   
Test class:   IV
Test expiry date:   27/11/2009
Advisory Notice issued
Nearside Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended (2.4.F.3)
Offside Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended (2.4.F.3)

6 days later and it passed, and afew days later after that i bought the car. Very odd indeed, car was from a dealer btw (dodgy dealer now I know)

Anyway, looking at the big fail list from the first test, I need some clearing up.

Ive sorted out most of it (by pure coincidence).
Ive got new tyres on there, new top mounts, new wishbone bushes and new balljoints (Fail from previous MOT), and the "Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)" Im guessing it was because there wasnt any water in the windscreen washer tank, cos I get plenty of water to the wishscreen. Also I checked both rear wheels and they spin freely, with no binding at all.


But I want to know what the following mean:

Steering system has excessive free play detected at the steering wheel (steering rack fitted) (2.2.A.1b)

I cant feel any play in the steering wheel  :huh:

Nearside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.3)

Offside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.3)


and then from the last MOT pass (the 6 days later) it was this advisories:
Nearside Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended (2.4.F.3)

Offside Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended (2.4.F.3)


I know the rear bump stops in the suspension are buggered, is that the meaning of the advisories?

Anyone shed any light on what the bits i put in bold mean?


khare  :cool:
« Last Edit: 10 June 2009, 16:19 by Khare »

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT hisrtory
« Reply #1 on: 10 June 2009, 16:16 »

Offline topher

  • Administrator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,594
  • fully functioning
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT hisrtory
« Reply #2 on: 10 June 2009, 16:20 »
6 days later?

check the months.. you dopey git :grin:

Offline perd999

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT history
« Reply #3 on: 10 June 2009, 16:22 »
Beat me to it topher - thought it was 3 months and 6 days... :laugh:

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT history
« Reply #4 on: 10 June 2009, 16:23 »
 :shocked:....... :sad:......... :embarassed:


i was never good at maths  :laugh: Anyway the dealer had said the previous owner, a "close" friend of his aparently had been using the car for months wthout problem, he had part exchanged it in for a merc, hence why the golf was for sale.
Ah well you live and learn, now I know one more thing to check in detail   :rolleyes:

Cheers for pointing that out though toph :afro: well spotted  :rolleyes:

Offline Len

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 16,298
  • Guardian of the Seas, Protector of Waves
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT history
« Reply #5 on: 10 June 2009, 16:27 »
They didnt drive it much in 3 months! (10 miles)
Mystic Blue Mk3 16v + Black Mk5 Gti 05 plate + Peugeot 405 Mi16

www.sas.org.uk
www.the-ace.org.uk

Offline Horney

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,782
  • Racing, Trackdays, Starwars.
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT history
« Reply #6 on: 10 June 2009, 16:28 »
Rear bushes are a common advisory/fail. A pig to change but the bushes themsleves are pretty cheap.

Nick

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT history
« Reply #7 on: 10 June 2009, 16:28 »
They didnt drive it much in 3 months! (10 miles)

yeah i know, not much damage was made though, the underneath is solid and engine doesnt smoke of rattle (normally anyway  :grin:)

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT history
« Reply #8 on: 10 June 2009, 16:29 »
Rear bushes are a common advisory/fail. A pig to change but the bushes themsleves are pretty cheap.

Nick
ahh right. I did have planned on sticking some polybushes at the back, might have to do them before MOT time in that case, good escuse to polybush the rear too lol

Offline JC

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 13,429
  • Back in the North.
Re: uh oh! Previous MOT history
« Reply #9 on: 10 June 2009, 16:31 »
shudda bought a mk2  :lipsrsealed: :rolleyes: