Mk2 trying to take me on?

[Hurdy]

Hurdy - your new sig looks great!

Cheers. I think I have this Adobe Photoshop thing sussed now

[Hurdy]

I'd do you a MKII sig like it, but I can't seem to find a photo of a MKII that doesn't have the bonnet up and the owner 's head inside it

See Chuff about that one. You could do one with an AA man hanging out the front!

I did actually LOL at that

[VeeDubGTI16v]

I'd do you a MKII sig like it, but I can't seem to find a photo of a MKII that doesn't have the bonnet up and the owner 's head inside it

thats the overtaken mk5 owner trying to work out why its so damn quick 

[Jkctr]

Have to say the thread turned out well! Most other marques with different mk's in the same model would be b!tching away for at least 50 pages!

 

[Rhyso]

Have to say the thread turned out well! Most other marques with different mk's in the same model would be b!tching away for at least 50 pages!

 

hmmm sounds like a poor effort on our part then    42 pages to go...............

[Jkctr]

Diesels suck (should sort out 40 pages) 

 

[JC]

MK5 are way quicker than MK2's that a fact! We are talking about depreciation, right?

especially now the 6 is out 

[Rhyso]

Diesels suck (should sort out 40 pages) 

 

still leaves us 2 pages short though 

how about my GTI is faster than every other car on the planet?

[Jkctr]

That should do a few, i can add something about ctr's but we need to think of the bandwidth 

MK2's when new were over £20k, you can get them for peanuts now, i would say they have depreciated more 

[Rhyso]

That should do a few, i can add something about ctr's but we need to think of the bandwidth 

MK2's when new were over £20k, you can get them for peanuts now, i would say they have depreciated more 

i can end that arguement there - CTR's suck 

hmm the MK2 is over 20 years old though and has had longer to lose it value