Author Topic: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.  (Read 2051 times)

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« on: 03 May 2009, 18:01 »
whats different about them?

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #1 on: 03 May 2009, 19:30 »
268/260 is a split profile, shrick use to make them designed to help with more torque lower down the rev range.

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #2 on: 03 May 2009, 20:29 »
cos im looking at the BBM cams and they have quite afew. Looking at around £90 for a 268/260 or 266 or 268 cam. what would you recommend?

VW BUSH

  • Guest
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #3 on: 03 May 2009, 21:37 »
I ran a 270 duration cam on one of my MK2s made it a bit lumpy on idle but it gave me est 5/7bhp with other std mods.
I have the old cam in the garage which i might stick in one day as ive been told they give better performance than the std Mk3 8v GTI cam.
I would say its better to do the tappets/seals at the same time cos it aint fun doing it twice as i found out :wink:

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #4 on: 03 May 2009, 21:41 »
270 is on the limit of to what i would use. I might do seals, but will deffo recondition the tappets. I might just buy another mk3 head and rebuild it completly with new seals and polishing it all. See how im doing for funds. Need to prioritise other things first.

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #5 on: 03 May 2009, 23:37 »
I would go for the split profile, will help the torque and also keep the idle smooth.

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #6 on: 04 May 2009, 11:40 »
I would go for the split profile, will help the torque and also keep the idle smooth.

I see. Im loking for power up the rev range tbh. Im not into the race off the lights thing, im more into 3k rpm+ stuff, and I dont mind a lumpy idle.

Offline Mikester

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,427
  • Civic Type R
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #7 on: 04 May 2009, 11:41 »
I would go for the split profile, will help the torque and also keep the idle smooth.

I see. Im loking for power up the rev range tbh. Im not into the race off the lights thing, im more into 3k rpm+ stuff, and I dont mind a lumpy idle.

had to be done, lol

as title. Say I want to do a flying start. 1st to 2nd takes moro effort to change. If it was as fast as 3rd to 4th for example, then I reckon it could shave 0.5/1 second off the 0-60 time.

Why?

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #8 on: 04 May 2009, 11:50 »
I would go for the split profile, will help the torque and also keep the idle smooth.

I see. Im loking for power up the rev range tbh. Im not into the race off the lights thing, im more into 3k rpm+ stuff, and I dont mind a lumpy idle.

had to be done, lol

as title. Say I want to do a flying start. 1st to 2nd takes moro effort to change. If it was as fast as 3rd to 4th for example, then I reckon it could shave 0.5/1 second off the 0-60 time.

Why?

Officer mikester on duty!

One thing is 0-60 testing, another thing is racing off the lights, where it is illegal  :wink:

Offline Mikester

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,427
  • Civic Type R
Re: difference between 268 cam and 268/260.
« Reply #9 on: 04 May 2009, 11:51 »
AH i do recall you at santa pod now i think of it...

Was only a joke mate. gheeeez