how does a remapped Gti fair against standard edition30?
Well according to Santa Pod's timing gear, very similar (only 1/10th sec in it). Although the Ed30 was DSG, but the GTI had other mods over remap (ie Exhaust, FMIC, Intake etc).
In accelaration terms I would say the mapped GTI would take a small lead upto just under triple figures, then after that the KO4 would bring the ED30 back in play and turn the tables around (but again by a small margain).
yeps, mapped gti is quicker than a std ed30
ask phil mc 
In addition, remapped 300+ stage 2 ed30's were only 1 or 2 tenths faster over a quarter mile, again traction issues.
Yes it was very cold and getting grip was tough, but its the same for both Vehicals so that cant be the reason for such a close set of results.
You have to throw some serious money at it to see huge benefits
The moral of the story is, if you cant control the traction, and cant afford to mod to cope, then dont bother
If you can then go for it. Awesome Machine 
Using the fastest standard Ed30 (with DSG) time against one of the slowest Ed30 times is hardly a fair comparison Steve.. 
For a fairer comparison...
Fastest standard ED30 DSG = 14.7 @ 96mph
Fastest "remapped 300+ stage 2" ED30 DSG = 13.2 @ 111mph.
Which is a fair sized gap mate, just a shame we never got to see what it would of looked like on the strip..
Yeah some of the modded Ed30 guys struggled with traction, which going by the conditons and being most peeps first time on the strip, was hardly suprising. But there was others that started to get the hang of it in the end as well as me (Neil M, Steve, Jonny C etc)
But all those cars ben are at a further state of tune then the ones i was baseding my example. Power is no good without traction.Thats not rocket science mate.
and at no point did i dismiss or deny at the quarter mile stage, speed difference between cars was 10+ mph.
Its only from 80mph that the Ed30 really motors on as per Timings on the day, and 60ft,330ft.1/8th distance etc.
Its the same conditions for both cars and yes better conditions would benefit BOTH cars.
Hurdys, Neils, your car,jonnys,nadeems,MatED30 cars have been modded more and had more spent on them then say Nathans,or GTijames, as an example.
Sorry mate, I still don't agree...
Yeah "Power is no good without control", but most of that control is down to the driver and his right foot. On my last run (not my best run either) I ran a 5.3 0-60 on the Racelogic timing equipment I borrowed, even with the cold conditions. In standard form I wouldn't match that. What were your 60ft, 330ft and 1/8th mile figures out of interest... As I bet they are all a fair bit slower? So no I don't think it's only 80mph onwards that a modded Ed30 is quicker than standard one, it's across the range. BUT that doesn't mean someone can't get in a modded ED30 and give it far to much beans, sit on the spot and end up wiith similar figures to a standard one. After all a lot of it is down to the driver IMO..
Not being funny, but you did say..
In addition, remapped 300+ stage 2 ed30's were only 1 or 2 tenths faster over a quarter mile, again traction issues.
Mine is Stage 2 mate, hence the reason I posted the reply..
Also..
Hurdys, Neils, your car,jonnys,nadeems,MatED30 cars have been modded more and had more spent on them then say Nathans,or GTijames, as an example.
My car has had a total of...
£500 Revo map
£250 Milltek TBE (Second hand)
£45 ITG Panel filter,
So I think you maybe wrong there also mate..
