Author Topic: To court, or not to court - that is the question!  (Read 14374 times)

Offline Teutonic_Tamer

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,562
  • GreasedMonkey - HoofHearted - GTI now mod'ed, ASK!
Re: To court, or not to court - that is the question!
« Reply #50 on: 30 January 2009, 10:28 »
The only snag is if you want the evidence, you have to get it BECAUSE you're going to court, you can't just have it for no reason.

....Then can't you proceed as if going to court, check the evidence, and : -

1) - If the video shows clearly you are at fault, write to the court pleading guilty and not wishing to waste the court's time, but explaining that you were in doubt and therefore needed to see the evidence as you feel it is your right to do so. This would all be done before any date of hearing was reached.

Unfortunately, by this time, the CPS have already worked on the case (the CPS have no involvements if a FPN is accepted and payed), and can still claim their costs.  I would, however, hope most magistrates are reasonable and actually deny any costs, providing a guilty plea is entered at the earliest opportunity after the video evidence was made available.  :sad:

Another problem, if the CPS only disclose the evidence 7 days before the Court hearing, the defendent is effectively commited to turning up in Court in person, thereby not only wasting his own time, but it will mean that a CPS lawyer will also be in the courtroom to present the charge and an outline of the evidence - again, adding to potential costs against the defendent - which wouldn't have occured if they had seen the vid at the roadside.  :sad:

Whilst the British legal system is supposed to be one of the best, it still does have some pitfalls too.
Sean - Independent Automotive Engineering Technician (ret'd)
-----
'06/7 Golf Mk5 GTI 5dr (BWA) DSG, colour coded,

I feel like a homo


Offline Egbutt Wash

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,094
Re: To court, or not to court - that is the question!
« Reply #51 on: 30 January 2009, 10:45 »
Ring 0161 233 2130 to speak to Mr Loophole, Nick Freeman.

Good enough for Clarkson.
Currently digging a bunker.

Offline Teutonic_Tamer

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,562
  • GreasedMonkey - HoofHearted - GTI now mod'ed, ASK!
Re: To court, or not to court - that is the question!
« Reply #52 on: 30 January 2009, 10:47 »
Ring 0161 233 2130 to speak to Mr Loophole, Nick Freeman.

Good enough for Clarkson.

Maybe, but you will need very deep pockets to afford his £3000 (or whatever it is) per hour rate.
Sean - Independent Automotive Engineering Technician (ret'd)
-----
'06/7 Golf Mk5 GTI 5dr (BWA) DSG, colour coded,

I feel like a homo


Offline Egbutt Wash

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,094
Re: To court, or not to court - that is the question!
« Reply #53 on: 30 January 2009, 10:54 »
Ring 0161 233 2130 to speak to Mr Loophole, Nick Freeman.

Good enough for Clarkson.

Maybe, but you will need very deep pockets to afford his £3000 (or whatever it is) per hour rate.

Here is his web page, you can listen to him waffling on.
http://www.freemankeepondriving.com/home.asp
One of the golden rules of my life is to avoid litigation at all costs.  Involvement with lawyers only leads to untold personal grief and misery.
Personally I'd just pay the fine and take the 3 points, job done.
Currently digging a bunker.