GolfGTIforum.co.uk

Model specific boards => Golf mk3 => Topic started by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 13:00

Title: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 13:00
 :rolleyes: chaps today i raced a clio sport and kept up with it isit that good or bad?

and whats better kompressor or supercharger?

 :evil:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport turbo ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 12 May 2011, 13:04
Well the clio can't have been trying very hard....

By kompressor do you mean turbo?
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport turbo ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 13:10
kompressor meaning of a merc  :laugh:

well in first gear me n him level n 2nd gear he went  :shocked:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 12 May 2011, 13:16
Well thats hardly keeping up with him! :tongue:

The first couple of milliseconds don't count really do they? :laugh:

So your asking whats better, a supercharger or a merc kompressor (Which is also a supercharger)??

Forgive me, but I'm failing to understand the question  :undecided:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Wayne on 12 May 2011, 13:21
Kompressor = supercharger  :rolleyes: it is just Mercs badging
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 12 May 2011, 13:26
Kompressor = supercharger  :rolleyes: it is just Mercs badging

Thats what confused me. Didn't know if he'd mistaken one for something else, as they are both the same
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 13:29
LOL it was mistaken :O kompressor is the german word for supercharger :D  but anyone no where i can second hand one from??
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Wayne on 12 May 2011, 13:31
LOL it was mistaken :O kompressor is the german word for supercharger :D  but anyone no where i can second hand one from??

Well the Merc supercharger is a Eaton m62 so try ebay etc.

Major work to fit it to the Golf however
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 12 May 2011, 13:32
kompressor is the german word for supercharger

I never guessed that  :tongue: :tongue: :laugh:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 13:33
wayne why isit major work to fit it???? :shocked:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Wayne on 12 May 2011, 13:36
wayne why isit major work to fit it???? :shocked:

Well budget around £2000 to fit it and get it working all ok.

Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 13:37
OMG  :shocked:  :laugh:  i think it better to turbo it :) haha
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: MotorPsycho on 12 May 2011, 13:39
fitting an eaton m45 to my mk1, from an slk230

picked up for a bargainous £50 on eaby ;)
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Wayne on 12 May 2011, 13:41
OMG  :shocked:  :laugh:  i think it better to turbo it :) haha

No cheaper or easier to sort.


fitting an eaton m45 to my mk1, from an slk230

picked up for a bargainous £50 on eaby ;)

M45 is only really good for up to a 1.6, will do very little on a 2.0
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 14:06
how much am i lookin to fit a turbo???  :huh:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: tweed on 12 May 2011, 14:56
how much am i lookin to fit a turbo???  :huh:

the same. tbh if your not going to do it your self you will pay about£5000 for a garage to fit a charger.
So much more work than your probably thinking.
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: VR6_Wherry on 12 May 2011, 15:12
This is exactly why we just say to fit a 1.8t.... :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: dom on 12 May 2011, 15:12
This thread is a bit of a fail tbh :grin:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: MK3 Menace on 12 May 2011, 15:43
Are you old enough the drive?
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 12 May 2011, 15:50
Sounds like the GolfGTI record player is broken again.
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: golf newbie on 12 May 2011, 15:55
Nitro for the win.. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 12 May 2011, 16:16
:) isit a long process to fit a turbo ur self???  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Khare on 12 May 2011, 16:28
Research it fella. This is covered a few times a week so there's plenty of info threads kicking about. Don't expect to do a turbo/supercharge conversion for anything under £1500 though, even if your welding and fabricating skills are amazing.
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 12 May 2011, 16:57
Nah, all you do is slap on a Trust T88 turbo, and bobs your uncle 800hp on standard internals  :grin:

Here's the linky just in case you missed it http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=192294.0 :)
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: MotorPsycho on 13 May 2011, 09:55


fitting an eaton m45 to my mk1, from an slk230

picked up for a bargainous £50 on eaby ;)

M45 is only really good for up to a 1.6, will do very little on a 2.0

Wrong, the M45 was desgined for 2.0 to 3.0l Mercedes, the Cooper S varient runs lower % overdrive plus its a very good flowing head. If you know what you're doing the power is there to be made4
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 13 May 2011, 10:27
=D can u do a twin turbo conversion on mk3 2.0 16v??
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Wayne on 13 May 2011, 10:52
=D can u do a twin turbo conversion on mk3 2.0 16v??

Nope not really, 1 would be enough.
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: mani12354 on 13 May 2011, 10:53
 :shocked: i want 2  :grin:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Wayne on 13 May 2011, 10:55
:shocked: i want 2  :grin:

What would be the point, you could only use 2 small turbos and a bigger turbo would give you more.

Plus you will struggle with room and heat issues etc.
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 13 May 2011, 12:33
Sell your mk3, buy an R32, then you can go bug the mk4 section on how to twin-turbo that, as that can actually done.
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: golf newbie on 13 May 2011, 12:36
Or buy a clio sport and race mk 3 golf`s.. :nerd:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: tweed on 13 May 2011, 15:20
Or don't post when you aint got a clue to what your going on about!
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: Wayne on 13 May 2011, 15:21
Or don't post when you aint got a clue to what your going on about!

Lol  :grin:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: leigh_harty on 13 May 2011, 16:50
Or don't post when you aint got a clue to what your going on about!

Then where would we get our kicks from?  :grin:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: golf newbie on 13 May 2011, 16:55
How hard would it be to fit a jet engine.?

Think i need 0 to mach  1 under 10 seconds..
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: dom on 13 May 2011, 17:21
Or don't post when you aint got a clue to what your going on about!

New sig quote me thinks :grin:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: trog_nfs on 13 May 2011, 18:00
Or don't post when you aint got a clue to what your going on about!

epic
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: tweed on 14 May 2011, 10:35
 :wink:
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: forsh on 14 May 2011, 15:42
=D can u do a twin turbo conversion on mk3 2.0 16v??

Nope not really, 1 would be enough.

you can but you need to fabricate your own manifolds
and thats gonna cost you a lot in a pipe bender and welders etc


get yourself a vr6 engine and slap that in,but then thats gonna cost your a bit putting that in yourself

just get yourself a vr6 car,less time and cost
Title: Re: Golf gti 2.0l 16 vs clio sport superchargered ecu remapp 200 bhp
Post by: VW BUSH on 15 May 2011, 11:21
Or don't post when you aint got a clue to what your going on about!

Then where would we get our kicks from?  :grin:

shadey of course :rolleyes: