Did you actually read any of TT's posts?
You aren't doing yourself any favours and are still in the wrong sunshine.

I have not at any point directed this discussion in an 'im right, you are wrong' way. Quite the opposite if you bothered to read the whole thread and saw i admitted i was fully wrong. Please grow up before you post such useless comments, you sound like frank butcher.
My point is, its just too hard to stop it and there are much worse things going on with cars that are illegal than aftermarket HIDs. I find it pathetic to get so worked up about it. I have them on at my own risk and i will continue to use them as they make it much safer at night for me. I would have never made it back from Italy without them, as after 1300 miles in one day, i was quite tired as it got dark and needed my lights like you wouldnt believe!
Being able to see more clearly makes me safer, TT's opinion, no matter how factual, on the matter wont affect my or any other of the millions of people whos cars are fitted with aftermarket HIDs decision.
Also my vehicle passed its mot last year with my HIDs and i made sure i left it the same so it passed next time, which it did. An MOT is a document which proves your car is road worthy and legal. I changed nothing on the car before or after! As i said if the MOT tester chose to pass it, the police officer who saw them chose to let me go and the insurance company who have insured them, then that means im legal as im insured, taxed and mot'd and both the MOT testers and insurers are fully aware of my HIDs.