Author Topic: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference  (Read 4711 times)

VeeDubGTI16v

  • Guest
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #10 on: 28 November 2007, 14:39 »
with their sh!tty petrol i bet its slower than our 1.8

Offline rubjonny

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 16,349
  • Hello, my name is John and I'm a dub addict.
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #11 on: 28 November 2007, 15:14 »
well who knows, could see some imported ones ;)  I saw an american Jetta coupe the other day :cool:
Hello my name is John and I'm a dub addict.

Offline rubjonny

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 16,349
  • Hello, my name is John and I'm a dub addict.
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #12 on: 28 November 2007, 15:15 »
as above yes it is slower, down in power by 3bhp compared to our 1.8 16v ;)
Hello my name is John and I'm a dub addict.

Offline Goops

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • mk2 gti 16v
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #13 on: 28 November 2007, 18:05 »
and whats wrong with west londoners now  :huh:

Offline bobbymk11

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #14 on: 28 November 2007, 19:00 »
if u stick a 2.0 16v into a mk2 it will be quicker than ur 1.8 16v...all day long

my old mk2 16v was a standard model engine wise and put out 150bhp on rollers....and was easily beaten by a mk2 2.0 16v especily at high motorway speeds it pulled away much better but not so much that i could keep up and wip its ass on the twistys as my suspension set up was far better :grin:...but a very good conversion and not to much work as long as you have a 90spec mk2 as wiring is different from early mk2 16v's ...
or as above just get 9a 2.0 bottom end..you will get bit more torque...

but if im honest ive never seen the point with a mk2 16v....i like them way they come....and if you stick a full stainless and 4-branch on a good valver and drill ur air box for better air flow bang a k&n filter in there you will easy get 160bhp ...and a valver with those mods sounds awesome on full pedal to the metal...

(ive just talked my self into getting another valver...god how i miss mine :cry:)

Offline WolfieMk2

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 22
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #15 on: 29 November 2007, 10:25 »
Hi
I'm looking at doing a 9A conversion as well. I'm curious to learn what the WUR mod is though?? I believe that a new fuel rail is required to convert that KJect to electronic. Does anyone know of an off the shelf rail to suit the 9A or is it a fabrication job?
Thanks

Offline Agreeable Slick

  • Global Moderator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,075
  • Unit
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #16 on: 29 November 2007, 10:35 »
Have a search of the forum, 9a's and WUR mods have been covered numerous times.

Offline WolfieMk2

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 22
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #17 on: 29 November 2007, 10:44 »
Ok, I've had a look at 9A & wur mod in the search field and nothing has come up. Do you know where on the forum to look. I'm still new to the forum so other than the search option????. Thanks

Offline ...joe

  • Forum Supporter
  • Forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,294
team grumpy....... its a way of life, not a forum post

mail@trimdeluxe.co.uk
www.facebook.com/Trimdeluxe

Offline WolfieMk2

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 22
Re: MK2 16V 1.8 and 2.0 difference
« Reply #19 on: 29 November 2007, 11:11 »
Ok thanks. I have been thinking about converting the Kject to an electronic system of sorts. The Kject seems a bit out dated these days? We didn't see the Kject twin cams in Australia (Digifant 8 valvers only). IS there any advice on converting to electronic injection regards options and fuel rails, wiring etc. I appreciate your replies by the way. :smiley: