Author Topic: Bridgestones, whats the problem?  (Read 48422 times)

Offline monkeyhanger

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,663
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #110 on: 20 January 2016, 20:23 »
possibly because a lot of GTI's came with Conti 2's, (at least in the early days). The GTI has a smoother torque build up than the GTD too despite what the power graphs would tell you. The only time I ever suffered any major wheelspin in my GTI was on a salted road in very low temps running Conti 3's being a bit brutal with the right pedal. The GTD torque hits in a nice big wallop!

A few years ago the mk6 section was full of people slating the cold weather grip on Goodyear F1's.

Forums and tyres eh?

Personally I'm going for Rainsports next time as a) I cover a piddly mileage and b) aside from about three days it's done nothing but rain in the South West for at least nine months.

In 19" at least, the Uniroyal Rainsport 3s are pretty cheap at certain places (seen then for as little as £94 a corner delivered - I assume 18s are considerably cheaper), but they last no time at all - which should be fine for piddly mileage.
Whey ya bugger! It's finally arrived after an 8 month wait....
MK7 R 5 door, manual, Lapiz Blue, Prets.

Jackie Treehorn

  • Guest
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #111 on: 20 January 2016, 21:39 »
I'm due a full set of summer tyres in March/April time and I'm considering my options. Given how impressed I've been with the Michelin Winters, I was just going to stick with the brand and go for a set of Pilot Sport 3's but might consider the Goodyears too.

The Continental won the EVO summer tyre test (in which they used a MK7 GTI as a test car, so I'll be hard pushed to make the decision.


The same expert source you quote has the Sport 3's you are thinking of in 8th place, Bridgestone in 9th. Why believe them for one and not the other?

The Mrs mighty 89bhp Kia came with Sport Contact 5's. Not really sure what that says about manufacturer tyre sourcing  :grin:

Good point

The Evo test is a very strange one, unless my eyes are playing tricks on me the Bridgestone tyre used (Bridgestone Potenza RE002 W 92) is not the tyre fitted to the GTi as standard and is not listed on Bridgestones website for the vehicle?  Very weird tyre choice for the test and hardly helps matters at all...

Offline monkeyhanger

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,663
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #112 on: 21 January 2016, 08:00 »
18" wheeled Golfs with Bridgesrones get Potenza S001, 19"ers get RE050A.
Whey ya bugger! It's finally arrived after an 8 month wait....
MK7 R 5 door, manual, Lapiz Blue, Prets.

Jackie Treehorn

  • Guest
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #113 on: 21 January 2016, 12:09 »
18" wheeled Golfs with Bridgesrones get Potenza S001, 19"ers get RE050A.

Yeah exactly, which is why the tyre tested is so odd.

Offline Walts

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #114 on: 10 February 2016, 10:01 »
OMG !!!! What a difference. I was told to not go balls out for the first few hundred miles until they scrubbed in, but straight from the off, the first thing I noticed is how quiet they are. Pulled out onto a main road (just down the road from the tyre place), and had to pull out sharpish, with zero miles on them and ambient at only 3°C, and it just took off - not a hint of wheel spin at all - and that's with 0 miles !

Just got to work (approx. 10 miles), and I can already tell how much better a tyre they are. Firstly (as mentioned) they are very quiet, not just on smooth surfaces, but on rough and semi-rough surfaces, where the Bridgestone's would roar. Secondly, the ride just seems that little bit more compliant and not as harsh over the bumps (although that could be my imagination).

Lastly, I clocked my MPG after pulling up at work (to be fair only a 10 mile journey, but a mix of urban, town centre and dual carriageways), and for reference the best I have EVER had out of the GTD, which was last summer time when it was much warmer, was 64.5 mpg (which I was delighted at). Well today after arriving at work I saw this (and don't forget - mines a DSG, a manual would be 5mpg or so better).



Now it could just be coincidence, (as to be honest, I can't see a different tyre making such a huge difference to MPG), but based upon the above, I do think they will be more economical. Tonight's journey home will be the test, where I've been struggling to get over 50mpg now the weather's turned cold, be interesting to see what the Goodyear's get under similar circumstances.

So far, a very happy bunny, and they treated my alloys with kid gloves and not a mark on them, and as a bonus filled them with Nitrogen at no extra cost and used black wheel weights as well !

How's the tyres goings now they'll have settled in a little?

Rang round for prices today and found the Same tyres online at £73 a corner or locally they're £88 fitted which I guess is about right.


Offline Sootchucker

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,348
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #115 on: 10 February 2016, 10:58 »
Brilliant now they have around 400 miles on them. Very grippy both wet and dry (even at these current >10°C temperatures we have at the moment), and much, much quieter than the Bridgestone's.

It's like I said before, the Bridgestone's weren't total crap, they just struggled to cope with the power and torque that the performance Golf's have on tap, and were a little too quick to spin up when it either got damp or the temperatures dropped, but they did give fantastic mileage. I changed them with still just under 4mm all round,  and at 20,500 miles, so I doubt the Goodyear's will last that long, but they do totally change the driving pleasure of the car.

Only last night I needed to get a quick getaway at a roundabout, and it was circa 5°C and quite wet. If I'd have booted it with the Bridgestone's on, the traction control light would have been on for several seconds, and I would have to cut the power or feather the throttle to get away, even then with wheel spin. Last night however on the Goodyear's I saw a gap and went for it, and aside for a momentary blip of the traction control light (not full throttle by any means) , the car just  catapulted away from the line with no drama at all..

Very pleased.
« Last Edit: 10 February 2016, 11:00 by Sootchucker »
2022 Tiguan R-Line 2.0 TSI 4-Motion. Nightshade blue, pano roof, IQ lights, Nav Pro, Harmon Kardon, Heated Windscreen, Heated rear seats, Wireless charging, Heads up display, dual height boot floor, Keyless with electric tailgate, Electronic TPMS, underbody protection, Area View Cameras

Offline Walts

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #116 on: 10 February 2016, 13:10 »
Brilliant now they have around 400 miles on them. Very grippy both wet and dry (even at these current >10°C temperatures we have at the moment), and much, much quieter than the Bridgestone's.

It's like I said before, the Bridgestone's weren't total crap, they just struggled to cope with the power and torque that the performance Golf's have on tap, and were a little too quick to spin up when it either got damp or the temperatures dropped, but they did give fantastic mileage. I changed them with still just under 4mm all round,  and at 20,500 miles, so I doubt the Goodyear's will last that long, but they do totally change the driving pleasure of the car.

Only last night I needed to get a quick getaway at a roundabout, and it was circa 5°C and quite wet. If I'd have booted it with the Bridgestone's on, the traction control light would have been on for several seconds, and I would have to cut the power or feather the throttle to get away, even then with wheel spin. Last night however on the Goodyear's I saw a gap and went for it, and aside for a momentary blip of the traction control light (not full throttle by any means) , the car just  catapulted away from the line with no drama at all..

Very pleased.

Appreciate the update buddy.......

I'm due two new fronts but think I'm sold on just changing the full set for the sake of the difference and it'll save me hassle in the future.

Happy motoring and thanks again

Offline lakelander

  • Just got here
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #117 on: 15 February 2016, 19:04 »
my 2015 GTi came new with Bridgestone Potenza S001 225/40/R18 ( Austins )
i must not drive as hard as some others- but my major gripe is cabin noise from the tyres on anything but smooth tarmac. Much of the northern end of the M6 is course tarmac and the noise at 70/80 is way too high for a refined car like the Golf.
Which tyres should i change to for a quiet (er ) ride. My local tyre man says Dunlop Sport Max RT, but nobody on this thread has mentioned them?

Offline Mk7-GTD

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 390
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #118 on: 15 February 2016, 19:24 »
my 2015 GTi came new with Bridgestone Potenza S001 225/40/R18 ( Austins )
i must not drive as hard as some others- but my major gripe is cabin noise from the tyres on anything but smooth tarmac. Much of the northern end of the M6 is course tarmac and the noise at 70/80 is way too high for a refined car like the Golf.
Which tyres should i change to for a quiet (er ) ride. My local tyre man says Dunlop Sport Max RT, but nobody on this thread has mentioned them?

Personally I have for the last number of years used Michelin as my go to tyre. I have sport cup 2's on both my CC and the Mk6 GTi that my wife has. Not saying that you need to go that extreme but Michelin often do deals especially with Costco so maybe some Pilot Sports.

Offline david25

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 554
Re: Bridgestones, whats the problem?
« Reply #119 on: 31 August 2016, 09:41 »
EVO October 2016, summer tyre test (235/35/19)

1 Conti 6 (9.8kg)
2 GY AS3 (9.6kg)
3 Yoko (10.5kg)
Now = 2011 MK6 GTI - Reflex Silver
Past = 2006 MK5 GTI - Tornado Red and Solid Black