pic of mk2 with rear and back side tinted windows

[mix]

nah i think ill pass, it'll look rubbish half done and id rather abide by the rules tbh! ill save up for some alloys instead!!

Good girl

Blues fav purchase....aslong as they aint the five spkoes yo had before

[Dizzie]

There's no law on how dark the back ones can be. Vans have them 100%

no tints are allowed between the B pillar and the front.

Cars that have darker windows on the back than the front look sh!te imo

[[han]]

if u get just the backs tinted, it CAN lower insurance in some cases as it can be classed as a van and not a car aslong as the tints r over a certain % and you need back window doin too! (correct me if im worng, but its something like that!)

[tinman]

something i found somewhere:

The Tintman device measures the amount of light transmitted into a vehicle and records the opacity of the glass. Windscreens on vehicles first used before April 1985 must let in 70 percent of light to stay legal. That figure rises to 75 percent for vehicles issued after that date. Front-side windows on all vehicles are required to let in 70 percent of light.

[spacedGTI]

post me a picture of your car and i'll do it in Photoshop.

[Agreeable Slick]

been done and it looks sh!t. No point in tinting the rears unless you want a van look about it.

[[han]]

i agree slick.. just keep norm windows i think they look less chav too! (no offence to ppl who have tinted windows... can look great, but not m kinda thing!)

[mix]

No point in tinting the rears unless you want a van look about it.

But then you can get up to stuff that people cant see

unless they walk round to the front