want my money back
That's a bit harsh.
Went to see it last night. I think it was trying to be too many different things. Something about Bond without any gadgets always seems a touch lacklustre - it just makes him into another action hero, rather than the sly old dog he should be, especially when the bad guys are sporting tech like depleted uranium rounds and neat glass cutting things.
Thought the lizard action was a good piece.
How many more Bonds does DC have in him?
Overall the film wasnt bad... it just wasnt great like the "best bond yet" bit they seem to advertise.
Lack of gadgets was pretty poor. As was the choice of women, of which there are usually a few in bond films to ensure they have catered for everyone.
Even the story line isnt great.... what is the bad guy exactly trying to do in this??? kill a m?
bit of a poor basis for a story. As was moving underground.... I mean get real.
All this stufff you can kind of get over but when it finished the first thing that came to mind was that this was a BUDGET BOND film. The action in the traliers... was the ONLY action.
