« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Does this look like a ...  (Read 4595 times)

Offline JC

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 13,429
  • Back in the North.
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #10 on: 27 March 2012, 20:24 »
Quote from: Jay on 27 March 2012, 20:22


What I don't get is putting a GTI badge on a non-GTI, and something that is as poxy as a 1.4 MK4 :grin:



why not, they did it with the Mk3 8v  :lipsrsealed:
Logged

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #11 on: 27 March 2012, 20:29 »
and 2.0 MK4 :lipsrsealed:


Craziness I tell thee :grin:
Logged
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

Quote from: PenguinGTI on 11 May 2012, 17:49
But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline F17BAD

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,225
  • Golf MTM S3 GTI TURBO
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #12 on: 27 March 2012, 21:25 »
and mk2 8v  :lipsrsealed:
Logged
  


Not no ordinary GTI....

House classics and Techno mixes:
https://soundcloud.com/bradkells
www.mixcloud.com/kells/

Offline Diamond Hell

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,997
  • Opinions я Us
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #13 on: 27 March 2012, 21:28 »
Quote from: F17BAD on 27 March 2012, 21:25
and mk2 8v

You do know not everything in the world revolves around your BHP figure, don't you?  :huh:
Logged
Just because you're offended doesn't make you right.

Holiday cottages on the Isle of Wight for 2-10 people? PM me.

Gavv8

  • Guest
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #14 on: 27 March 2012, 21:29 »
Quote from: Chuff on 27 March 2012, 20:24
Quote from: Jay on 27 March 2012, 20:22


What I don't get is putting a GTI badge on a non-GTI, and something that is as poxy as a 1.4 MK4 :grin:



why not, they did it with the Mk3 8v  :lipsrsealed:
Rubbish, it's an excellent Gti..
Logged

Offline Bellend

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,721
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #15 on: 27 March 2012, 21:54 »
Quote from: Gavv8 on 27 March 2012, 21:29
Quote from: Chuff on 27 March 2012, 20:24
Quote from: Jay on 27 March 2012, 20:22


What I don't get is putting a GTI badge on a non-GTI, and something that is as poxy as a 1.4 MK4 :grin:



why not, they did it with the Mk3 8v  :lipsrsealed:
Rubbish, it's an excellent car...
Logged

Where all my moneys went.

Golf MK3 1.6. Golf MK3 8v GTI.

Offline F17BAD

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,225
  • Golf MTM S3 GTI TURBO
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #16 on: 27 March 2012, 22:00 »
Quote from: Diamond Hell on 27 March 2012, 21:28
Quote from: F17BAD on 27 March 2012, 21:25
and mk2 8v

You do know not everything in the world revolves around your BHP figure, don't you?  :huh:

whats that got to do with a mk2 8v GTI. :huh:.  115 bhp is weak now, it was weak back in the day too when we were all rocking twin cam 16v, RS Turbos and even 16V KR Golfs

8v MK2 are as bad as 8v Mk3..



Logged
  


Not no ordinary GTI....

House classics and Techno mixes:
https://soundcloud.com/bradkells
www.mixcloud.com/kells/

Offline SoundillusioN

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,004
  • If I can't fix it at home, it ain't getting fixed.
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #17 on: 28 March 2012, 13:39 »
Quote from: F17BAD on 27 March 2012, 22:00
Quote from: Diamond Hell on 27 March 2012, 21:28
Quote from: F17BAD on 27 March 2012, 21:25
and mk2 8v

You do know not everything in the world revolves around your BHP figure, don't you?  :huh:

whats that got to do with a mk2 8v GTI. :huh:.  115 bhp is weak now, it was weak back in the day too when we were all rocking twin cam 16v, RS Turbos and even 16V KR Golfs

8v MK2 are as bad as 8v Mk3..

Wouldn't go that far, there's almost 20 bhp per tonne difference for a start.
Logged

Offline sveed1.8T

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,014
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #18 on: 28 March 2012, 16:56 »
Quote from: SoundillusioN on 28 March 2012, 13:39
Quote from: F17BAD on 27 March 2012, 22:00
Quote from: Diamond Hell on 27 March 2012, 21:28
Quote from: F17BAD on 27 March 2012, 21:25
and mk2 8v

You do know not everything in the world revolves around your BHP figure, don't you?  :huh:

whats that got to do with a mk2 8v GTI. :huh:.  115 bhp is weak now, it was weak back in the day too when we were all rocking twin cam 16v, RS Turbos and even 16V KR Golfs

8v MK2 are as bad as 8v Mk3..

Wouldn't go that far, there's almost 20 bhp per tonne difference for a start.
Mans got a point! The lighter the car, the less bhp you need for it to have an effect!
Logged

Offline Ant1981

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,601
  • Feed me, prod me
Re: Does this look like a ...
« Reply #19 on: 28 March 2012, 17:05 »
Quote from: Gavv8 on 27 March 2012, 21:29
Quote from: Chuff on 27 March 2012, 20:24
Quote from: Jay on 27 March 2012, 20:22


What I don't get is putting a GTI badge on a non-GTI, and something that is as poxy as a 1.4 MK4 :grin:



why not, they did it with the Mk3 8v  :lipsrsealed:
Rubbish, it's an excellent Gti..

The rubbish part is correct  :grin:
Logged
Quote from: Lewy on 14 September 2011, 23:39
80% of your posts are total tripe, as they are mostly replies to sh1te posts created by the morons that, unfortunately this forum attracts.

'02 VW Golf 1.8 GTi Turbo - 186,000 miles
'09 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R
1990 VW Golf GTi 16V - Gone but not forgotten
Currently considering next car
Pages: 1 [2] 3
« previous next »