Author Topic: MOT RULE  (Read 3908 times)

mix

  • Guest
Re: MOT RULE
« Reply #20 on: 22 February 2005, 11:50 »
Shouldn't the first MOT come after either 3 years or 50k on the clock??  wouldnt that stop didgy cars that are three years old!

Offline tinman

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,229
Re: MOT RULE
« Reply #21 on: 22 February 2005, 11:57 »
if they were to make a rule change it should be that a 3yo car must be able to pass its first MOT first time (sans brake pads/discs/consumables).

if a manufacturer has too many strikes against them then their 3 year rule is lowered to 1 or 2 until they can show that their cars are safe during their initial period on the road. i'd also make it mandatory that the dealership cannot be linked to the first MOT inspection.

as for high mileage cars needing to be tested - i totally disagree. the high mileage cars are the ones that are probably okay as their high maileage has simply been gained going up and down the motorways. so there is very little wear on their brakes, clutches tend to be okay, steering and everything to do with steering are okay, emissions are okay because the car has been used regulary and so forth. they also tend to of been maintained very highly as the owner puts a premium on reliability.

the cars that need MOTing after a year are the ones that are truly thrashed from the start and lets face it - we all have a firend who cannot drive to save their life and take it out on the car. (eg change up at 4k, sharp braking, unprogressive steering, holding high revs for no reason whatsoever, kerbing the car, etc.)


Offline carrie

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
  • i can see into your soul and its not good
Re: MOT RULE
« Reply #22 on: 22 February 2005, 12:08 »
tin i.e. company car drivers 'dont care its not my car' mainenace is one thing but thats assuming it has been done properly, and seing as how vw managed to miss points on my car which maywell of failed an mot this highlights maintenance is not always what it seems and the need for mot inspections.
i think mot stations should not have a repair shop attached to them and make it a condition of their licence that they cannot recommend a garage either or they lose their licence. this would stop the rogues who bump up the failures to get work.


SAY YOU LOVE SATIN?, NO SATAN, ITS SATAN

Offline AudiA8Quattro

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,776
Re: MOT RULE
« Reply #23 on: 22 February 2005, 12:38 »
Where did my post go?  :cry:
FOR DIY GUIDES GO TO <br>www.volkswagenaudi.co.uk<br/>BRAKES, SUSPENSION, CV JOINTS

Offline carrie

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
  • i can see into your soul and its not good
Re: MOT RULE
« Reply #24 on: 22 February 2005, 12:48 »
not sure the site seems slow maybe to do with that?


SAY YOU LOVE SATIN?, NO SATAN, ITS SATAN

Offline AudiA8Quattro

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,776
Re: MOT RULE
« Reply #25 on: 22 February 2005, 12:52 »
Maybe  :sad:
It does keep coming up with time out.
Anyway i was just saying that cars that have covered high miles and are less than 3 years old, and that have NOT been serviced properly. are far more likely to be unroadworthy, whether motorway miles or not.
So i think you had a point that a car less than 3 years old could be just as unroadworthy as an older car.
The whole business is a scam  :laugh:
FOR DIY GUIDES GO TO <br>www.volkswagenaudi.co.uk<br/>BRAKES, SUSPENSION, CV JOINTS

Offline carrie

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
  • i can see into your soul and its not good
Re: MOT RULE
« Reply #26 on: 22 February 2005, 13:07 »
i had a friend who was road traffic and he reconed he could probably do most new cars for something


SAY YOU LOVE SATIN?, NO SATAN, ITS SATAN