The basic system in my 11.5-y-o Peugeot was very good, and I'm not convinced the 310 is as good. There seems to be a bit more sibilant in radio speech, and I'm not sure the music is as involving. I did think that nearly 12 years later, the basic Golf system would be at least as good as the basic Peugeot system was then, but maybe not.
It's still not bad though, and I'm not necessarily complaining. It's only a car audio. I really didn't want that big TV screen in the middle of my console.
To continue the derail for a bit, I know my Linn amp has some complete BS attached to it. Some years ago, I needed new speaker cables, and I remembered that the dealer had been going on about biwiring the speakers as a great thing to do. So I thought, why not. I ended up with a couple of chunks of inflexible sugarally, which I was told had to be plugged in in one direction only. I thought there was an improvement but there was no way to do a listening comparison and I now know I fooled myself.
If was only when I moved house, and the stiff Linn cables simply wouldn't fit the geometry of the new room, that I realised quite how much BS it had been. I had to buy new cables again, and to their credit I didn't get any guff about direction, or even the merits of biwiring, from the second dealer. However, it was only when trying to figure out how to wire them that I realised there was nothing on the amp to differentiate treble and bass connections. A little bit of discussion on another forum made it clear to me that the two sets of outputs on the amp are identical. There is no feasible way that biwiring can possibly make any difference to the sound of my system. And yet the instruction manual for the amp waxes lyrical about the great benefits to be gained from this "upgrade".
Mr. Tiefenbrun, I'm ashamed of you.
Rolfe.