DYNO SHOOT OUT DAY FASTEST BHP WINS

[kells]

sex with the car isnt something id do mate no 

take it you dont have a GF then hahahaha

[bratty]

sex with the car isnt something id do mate no 

take it you dont have a GF then hahahaha

how did ya guess lol??

women are too much grief m8

[Petec82]

tbh vr6 is overestimated.....only 30 hp more than a 16v, yet it has 800cc more and 2 more cylinders......

I couldn't agree more! In mk3 standard form the 16v is deffo ftw. The vr ain't all that! Still want a 20v T in my mk3 though
Pete

[IAN C]

i had a gti 8 valve before my first vr6 ( i have had 3 now) when i got my gti the next week my mate got a vr6 took me for a drive..........and i sold my gti the next week. trust me if you drive a vr6 you wont want to go backwards even a turbo gti, i would rather put a turbo on my vr. my last vr6 was 220 bhp but had some good mods on the engine. this one i have done nothing to and done 177bhp for a 15 year old car with 140000 on the clocks is s**t hot.

[Petec82]

i had a gti 8 valve before my first vr6 ( i have had 3 now) when i got my gti the next week my mate got a vr6 took me for a drive..........and i sold my gti the next week. trust me if you drive a vr6 you wont want to go backward :smiley:s even a turbo gti, i would rather put a turbo on my vr. my last vr6 was 220 bhp but had some good mods on the engine. this one i have done nothing to and done 177bhp for a 15 year old car with 140000 on the clocks is s**t hot.

Yeah but it's 177 bhp from a 2.8 v6. You really could do much better! I am not denying it's more powerful than a gti and I do like the vr! But all that engine for those numbers.... Give me the 20v T. Oh and I have driven a vr! Loved it.
Pete

[kells]

i had a gti 8 valve before my first vr6 ( i have had 3 now) when i got my gti the next week my mate got a vr6 took me for a drive..........and i sold my gti the next week. trust me if you drive a vr6 you wont want to go backwards even a turbo gti, i would rather put a turbo on my vr. my last vr6 was 220 bhp but had some good mods on the engine. this one i have done nothing to and done 177bhp for a 15 year old car with 140000 on the clocks is s**t hot.

iv had a vr before mate, it was my mates but i was the driver of it, i now got a 8v haha, tbh the vr didnt impress, it was alot slower than my swift GTI which is only a 1.3 hahaha (although 158bhp), not sayin the vr is bad but jsut your message above dont really ring true, not for me anyhow

would deffo much rather have a 20vt unde rthe hood than a vr lump, thats is a deffo!!!, BAM all the way, VR dont handle aswell as the 8v either, far too much weight up front

[IAN C]

your all wrong lol i love a bit of banter

[DazVR6]

Each to their own i say....i loved my vr, the sound the torque...pulled hard in any gear, not like my old valver where you had to drop a gear to get anywhere.

Been in an 8v and tbh it was wack but like i said each to their own.

[IAN C]

by the way the vr6 is 174bhp standard

[kells]

dont think anyone is sayin the vr isnt the fastest mk 3 out of the box mate..because it is

just theirs other things out their thats better for what ever reason