Author Topic: The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....  (Read 8799 times)

Offline S11EPS

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,305
  • No golfs here. Only a C63 mercedes
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #30 on: 28 July 2004, 11:11 »
Police SOCO came out to fingerprint the car, which was clean of prints, but she took some fibres from the sharpest bits of metal (which swere presumably from gloves they wore, hence no prints) and some imressions of the scrape marks made by whatever tools they used.
 
The SOCO woman said that on older cars, if you can get to the wires of the central locking you can short them out, which will energise the locking, unlock the car and switch the alarm off.

The technique they used to (try) to get into the car suggests tht they didn't really know what they were doing, so I guess they were going for contents, rather than steal the entire car.

It just goes to show how car security has moved on, as that's two fairly hefty attempts at getting in, and they've failed both times.

The greatest leveller of them all - the Carousel

golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #31 on: 28 July 2004, 12:32 »
I thought you live in a nice area Simon  :-\

Offline eyeletboy

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #32 on: 28 July 2004, 12:54 »
that's one hell of a chuffing mess >:(wouldnt been easier for them to smash the god damm window ::)effing halfwits.gutted for you mate :'(

Offline jv

  • Administrator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,223
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #33 on: 28 July 2004, 13:09 »
that's what seems odd, why not just smash the window? deadlocks I guess so would still be hard work to get in. b&stardos  >:(
Buy site stuff!
GolfGTI.co.uk - merchandise

Support the forum charity!
Forum Charity

Offline richandhazel

  • Global Moderator
  • Forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,464
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #34 on: 28 July 2004, 13:20 »
Smashing the window would have been easier I would have thought, however they would have set the alarm off then wouldn't they? Maybe they were trying to get at the wiring to overide the central locking and alarm :-\

Offline Joester

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #35 on: 28 July 2004, 13:39 »
My neighbour puts a special dye under hie wingmirrors, because he is fed-up of people messing around with them.
Then all he has to do is sit in his front room and wait for a lad with green hands to walk past...

Offline Martz

  • Forum Supporter
  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,273
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #36 on: 28 July 2004, 13:48 »
My neighbour puts a special dye under hie wingmirrors, because he is fed-up of people messing around with them.
Then all he has to do is sit in his front room and wait for a lad with green hands to walk past...

Excellent!

nyone remember that guy that wired his Cossie up. Anyone who touched it got a electric shock :o, he got sued for doing that by a theive! And the other theive that got in a car and got a spring stuck in his backside, again the owner got sued.


Fielder5757

  • Guest
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #37 on: 28 July 2004, 14:32 »
I thought you live in a nice area Simon  :-\

So do i but theres always break ins, If your going after expencive stuff you go to a nice expencive area to do it.

Offline S11EPS

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,305
  • No golfs here. Only a C63 mercedes
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #38 on: 28 July 2004, 14:56 »
I thought you live in a nice area Simon  :-\

I do mate, but thanks to the Labour party's fabulous housing policy, a developer has to make a percentage of any new development available to 'affordable/social housing'.

In no way do I wish to tar everyone with the same brush or make wild accusations, but the first break in happened two weeks after all the social housing on the edge of the development became occupied.

I can't understand why the government thinks that putting these sorts of homes in the same area as ?200-500k houses is in any way a positive move, because as far as I'm concerned there is no sense of integration whatsoever.

Sorry if this causes anyone any offence, (and I certainly didn't wish to turn this into a political thread) but I'm still smarting a wee bit  :-[

The greatest leveller of them all - the Carousel

Offline Martz

  • Forum Supporter
  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,273
Re:The shepsmobile falls foul to d!ckheads, once again.....
« Reply #39 on: 28 July 2004, 15:12 »
Totally agree with you there mate. If I wanted a cheap house in a cheap area next to rough people, I would choose to live there. But I don't, and I don't want these people near me.

I bet the MP's that thought of this idea don't have the same problem. Course they don't! >:(