Hi all, Have just been reading the huge thread about the various new tyre options, and noticed that the Dunlop Sportmaxx tyres are acknowledged to be pants. Interesting, as I have 4 of these bad boys on my GTI and I can't say I'm particularly impressed with how quickly they give up grip, especially away from the line, but this could of course be down to lack of driver talent and a heavy right foot so I'd be interested in others opinion on them.
That is just one of their problems!
They also have quite a harsh ride, but also suffer from static deformation too (which indicates weaknesses in the actual carcass).
It seems like the F1 Asymmetrics and the more expensive PS2's are universally applauded,
I personally disagree that PS2s are more expensive than the Goodyears. OK, the 'advertised' prices for Michelins are usually £10-15 higher than their rivals, but with some hard haggling, then PS2s can be had for much cheaper prices than advertised. And don't forget - Goodyears are made by the same company as Dunlops!

my question is under normal spirited road driving would the average driver notice the difference between the Dunlops and the superior Asymmetrics or PS2s?
Absolutey. Even under remotely hard cornering, the deficiencies of the ShyteMaxx are clearly shown compared to PS2s. Same for traction and hard braking. Try very hard braking on a dry road with the ShyteMaxx, and the ABS will be working overtime. Do the same with PS2s, and you will have to press the brake pedal MUCH harder to activate the ABS.
There really is a huge difference in grip. Which might explain why Porsche fit PS2s as standard, but refuse to supply any kind of Dunflop.

Anybody made the change and care to comment?
Yup. Gone from ShyteMaxx to PS2 (in axle pairs) on the GTI - where you can unequivically compare the differences. And also gone from Pirelli P-Zero Rosso to PS2 on my RS4, and Continental SportContact2 to PS2 on my last S4. And before that, gone from Yokohama AVS Sport to PS2 on a previous car. On every occasion, the PS2s were a massive increase in performance over what they replaced. And before the PS2 came out, I went from a truely dangerous Yokohama AVS S1Z (asymmetrics) to the original Mich Pilot Sport - again, a massive improvement.
The reason for the question is I've owned the car from 9000 miles, and its now done 13000 and, despite my best efforts, the tyres appear to have LOADS of tread left, hence I'm wondering if its worth the expense of replacing them early; if there's not much difference then I'll leave it, if changing the tyres makes a huge difference then I might as well do it now as these Dunlops appear indestructable and capable of lasting forever (or maybe I need to try harder...)
I
think I wore the original ShyteMaxxes down on the front of the GTI in about 8k miles. That was on a brand new car (with the first 1800miles running in), and also with sharing the driving with my SWMBO. And to be honest, the PS2s last roughly the same - maybe 1k miles less - but the level of grip improvement (and therefore safety) from the PS2s is surely worth the loss of 1k miles.

Maybe you ought to turn off your traction control, and just 'try harder' wearing them out if you are worried about sending them to landfill before they are due.

EDIT: just checked my records, and the PS2s lasted about 10k - so they lasted LONGER than the ShyteMaxx