Whoa that 'both bottom ends are identical' pony!! I thought they were and bought a 2.0 8v (2e)bottom end and then found it wouldnt fit...its the pistons that are different- the 16v ones are angled to clear the valves. The distributor on the 8v is driven off the oil pump drive shaft whilst the 16v has a blanking plate and the dizzy drives from the cams. The blocks are the same otherwise.
Dont anyone else make this (expensive) mistake- i was gutted as i spent ages looking for a block and then brought the wrong one and then had to find the right one...

However- the 6a and 9a 2.0 16v (2j) bottom ends are identical except for the sumps and manifolds. The '6a' is fittted to Audis and is in-line, whilst the Passat/Corrado have a transverse '9a', hence the different shaped sumps. I trhink the oil pump is different too- i fitted a brand new 9a one anyway but forgot to compare them!
There are more Audis kicking around and so i bought a 1991 Audi 80 Quattro 2.0 16v and then just swapped the entire engine over. If you go for the later ABF type it is a 'tall block' design and as has been mentioned it will ding your bonnet.
I also heard it was detuned to not embarrass the VR6. The 6a/9a had to run a cat and so had a milder cam than the 1.8 KR 16v, this is why peeps swap the cams over- its only one (exhaust i guess) thats different but i swapped both anyway...
If you want an easy swap go for a 6a/9a as it all swaps over without having to rewire anything. If you want to be able to chip it go for an ABF as its more powerful as standard anyway and has funky elektronik stuff..
I only speak from my experience (sorry if i am wrong on any of the above!) but either engine will transform a mk2!!
