Author Topic: 0-60 in 9  (Read 16020 times)

Blue MK2

  • Guest
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #60 on: 11 November 2003, 12:18 »
u get me! Just a little credit on 16v's

Offline Slim Shady

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 484
  • Thrash her like a ginger step child
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #61 on: 11 November 2003, 12:19 »
you've got mates with Fiestas?


chuck em!

Offline AdamB

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,923
  • The Perfect Storm
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #62 on: 11 November 2003, 12:20 »
My mate in his XR2i got pissed on by a girl

oo-er, did it stain his seats :o
I don't own this anymore - I just can't be arsed to change the picture

Offline Slim Shady

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 484
  • Thrash her like a ginger step child
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #63 on: 11 November 2003, 12:23 »
lol

I have to pay  for that privilege.

Blue MK2

  • Guest
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #64 on: 11 November 2003, 12:26 »
Yeah ive converted my mates. Ther all dubbers now 8)

Offline tinman

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,229
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #65 on: 11 November 2003, 13:37 »
I've raced a Mk2 16v off the lights (many years ago) in my old Mk1 8v, ok I know it's not the best of comparisons but, I held the 16v all the way to 60mph, it was only when the 16v got into 3rd that it started pulling away from me. I guess that's where the longer gears and all the extra higher revving power really make a difference.
Although I wish we could just settle this once and for all, can't we all just agree that both the Mk2 8v and 16v are great cars?



A well looked after 1800 Mk1 GTI will give a 16v Mk2 a run for its money. You'll need miles to overhaul a steriod induced Mk1 1800 in a valver.

I can't remember a 8v owner ever keeping up with my valver at over 50.

We have settled this once and for all. Read my earlier posts - it blows a serious hole in this idea that the 8v is a better town car because it has a huge amount of torque at low end.

The 16v is a better hot hatch. Face it.

Tin

Offline tinman

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,229
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #66 on: 11 November 2003, 13:41 »
Yeh 8v's are slow like mine but what ever suits you i guess?
16v are more complex are they?

My mate in his XR2i got pissed on by a girl in her fiesta 1.25 16v with 4 fat people in. NOW THAS PISS TAKING!

Your comparing chalk and cheese.

The 1.25 16v Ford engine is very sweet. In the fiesta - it is a very quick car. Quite simply, its a sheep in wolves clothing and should be aproached with care.

Tin

Offline S11EPS

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,305
  • No golfs here. Only a C63 mercedes
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #67 on: 11 November 2003, 14:32 »
Sorry to be a bit boring, but I've only just caught up with this thread, so..... going back to the original question of is 0-60 in 9 secs pants (when the book quotes 8 seconds or whatever) what you have to bare in mind is how the manufacturer or test driver extracts these published figures from a car.

I seriously doubt that anyone here has ever equalled or bettered a published figure with a standard car, because no-one would ever drive their own car like a test driver drives a manufacturers test or press car.

These cars really are caned and caned and caned to get the best possible figures from them. Unless you are best friends with Mr Clutch, I doubt that you use the same standing start technique as a test driver, and if you have one ounce of mechanical sympathy in your body, then 1 second adrift from a manufacturers claims really isn't that bad at all.

There are obvious exceptions to this rule (like when a manufacturer publishes figures for a given car,  that every car mag in the country then go out and smash, and then proclaim as a much faster car than previously imagined, sneaky manufacturers, eh?) but on the whole those figures are unrepeatable in the real world. But its ok, because that applies to every make and model of car, as they are all tested in the same way.

The greatest leveller of them all - the Carousel

Offline boogeysheftel

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 38
Re:0-60 in 9
« Reply #68 on: 12 November 2003, 07:37 »
yes, maybe, good point, also i remember i drove that time with two mates in a car, it was heavier