Author Topic: 1st post mk4 without a turbo  (Read 2260 times)

Offline mcgee9t2

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,289
Re: 1st post mk4 without a turbo
« Reply #10 on: 16 September 2010, 21:17 »
cant say ive ever been in a 2.0 so wouldnt know.

although just looked on the internet and its 2 seconds faster 0-60.

wtf?!?!?!?!! how?

Offline richw911

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 18,673
  • The Linkmeister and an OEM Freak.
Re: 1st post mk4 without a turbo
« Reply #11 on: 16 September 2010, 21:47 »
cant say ive ever been in a 2.0 so wouldnt know.

although just looked on the internet and its 2 seconds faster 0-60.

wtf?!?!?!?!! how?

2.0 = 115 bhp  :wink:

MKIV Mod Squad™ a part of the headlight police.

Offline mcgee9t2

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,289
Re: 1st post mk4 without a turbo
« Reply #12 on: 16 September 2010, 22:01 »
yeah i know, i noticed then that it had less bhp too, but still, how?

is there that much difference in the design of the engine?

Offline richw911

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 18,673
  • The Linkmeister and an OEM Freak.
Re: 1st post mk4 without a turbo
« Reply #13 on: 17 September 2010, 08:14 »
yeah i know, i noticed then that it had less bhp too, but still, how?

is there that much difference in the design of the engine?

In a word yes the 2.0 is 8 valve, The 1.8 is 20 valve, yours is simply a much better engine  :smiley:

MKIV Mod Squad™ a part of the headlight police.

Offline mcgee9t2

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,289
Re: 1st post mk4 without a turbo
« Reply #14 on: 17 September 2010, 08:28 »
Sweeeeeeeet :D. Up untill last night I thought the 2.0 was faster