« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Which is better ?  (Read 1018 times)

Offline rakesh27

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
Which is better ?
« on: 12 October 2009, 20:59 »
Guys,

Im nearly finished in doing alittle update on my car, i will post pics as soon as its done, Im thinking of getting the Miltek ca-back exhaust double pipes with front and rear 4motion valances.

Im not sure which to get resonated (silence) or non resonated (noise), i would prefer alittle exhaust note, not so loud so i cant hear my sounds.

What is best for my car, i own a Golf 1.8 GTi-Turbo RTech remap stage1 200bhp AGU 007p etc.

I do want alittle noise but no so much :)

Logged

Offline Wazzzer

  • Moderator
  • 10k hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,172
  • Golf GTI 1.8T AGU
Re: Which is better ?
« Reply #1 on: 12 October 2009, 21:04 »
non resonated then. I have a Blueflame on mine and it purrs on tickover, wouldn't want it any louder but that's just my personal pref
Logged


1999 1.8T: R-Tech remap - 225bhp/256lb/ft : K03s : THS FMIC : THS PCR pipe : 2.5" stainless exhaust : THS FR3 Engine mounts : G60/VR6 clutch : Calibra Yellow injectors : VR6 MAF : Devils Own WMI : Forge 007p : Carbonio CAI : Leon Cupra R Brembos : FK AK Street coilovers : Votex skirts : Anniversary front : click ---> http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=92175

Offline northeast_gti-t

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,554
  • "1.8T AGU"
Re: Which is better ?
« Reply #2 on: 13 October 2009, 09:42 »
i have the non res on mine tbh not overly loud has a nice note to it when under acceleration and tickover  :wink:
Logged
2000 Mkiv GTi 1.8T AGU

Offline jtomlin

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 615
  • 1999 AGU 1.8T GTI
Re: Which is better ?
« Reply #3 on: 13 October 2009, 10:07 »
i have the non resonated, its really not loud at all, id be suprised if you can hear the resonated at all!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »