« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Did u c?  (Read 1735 times)

Offline M4TTY

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Did u c?
« on: 23 December 2003, 10:01 »
Did n e 1 c the race between the mk1 n mk4 golf gti's on top gear??

Just proves that old skool still rules!!!
Logged

Offline workhorse '90 8v

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re:Did u c?
« Reply #1 on: 23 December 2003, 10:12 »
they should have gone around the track tho...
Logged

Offline M4TTY

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re:Did u c?
« Reply #2 on: 23 December 2003, 10:21 »
yeah, and we could av talkin bets
Logged

Offline workhorse '90 8v

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re:Did u c?
« Reply #3 on: 23 December 2003, 10:30 »
I was suprised that the 205 1.9 lost.
not that i know anythin about pugs tho?
I thought the 1.9 was suposed to be a bit of a beast?

a rattley beast at that, having driven a 1.6 an it as a bag of sh!t..

so 1.9's are naff too are they? anyone know?
Logged

Offline M4TTY

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re:Did u c?
« Reply #4 on: 23 December 2003, 10:39 »
Looks that way, i thought they were fast aswell.
Logged

Offline mugly

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 21
Re:Did u c?
« Reply #5 on: 23 December 2003, 11:00 »
They are fast. Just that they had it up against the new pug 180bhp gti, 50 brake difference which is even faster and not at all lardy like a mk4.
Logged

kniterider

  • Guest
Re:Did u c?
« Reply #6 on: 23 December 2003, 14:29 »
yep the 'garlic' 1.9 pugs are quick, it suprised me too i thought they would have been equal if not the 205 win!!, but there ya goes!!!, oh yeah it was over 1/5th of a mile and NOT 1/4 i wonder why???????, id like to see the same test on the 1/4 at least one of the results may have been even or different!!! oh yeah whats with the 'lardy' bit!! i like to call it more refined!! lol  :D :D :D :D
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »