Author Topic: mk2 vr6 and mk2 1.8t? who is the quickest? you decide  (Read 14800 times)

Offline GolfGTiMk216LoveIT

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
Re: mk2 vr6 and mk2 1.8t? who is the quickest? you decide
« Reply #30 on: 18 December 2005, 21:46 »
everyone knows i am talkin about a mk2 1.8t and a mk2 vr not the standards right?

Judderi

  • Guest
Re: mk2 vr6 and mk2 1.8t? who is the quickest? you decide
« Reply #31 on: 19 December 2005, 09:32 »
what if the vr was supercharged?
as thats what im intending on doin when its up n running

would it be a lot of difference

Yeah but will you ever get it up and running? Hows it coming on? Not seen any updates in agaes!

Offline Agreeable Slick

  • Global Moderator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,075
  • Unit
Re: mk2 vr6 and mk2 1.8t? who is the quickest? you decide
« Reply #32 on: 19 December 2005, 14:05 »
As i read about on another VW forum this was discussed about VRs having more displacement because of the extra two cylinders. Was quite interesting, although some valid points made, the outcome was the same.

There is no replacement for displacement............


Yes there is it is called boost.

Turbo wins.

Offline Dizzie

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,882
  • Make friends with your fast
Re: mk2 vr6 and mk2 1.8t? who is the quickest? you decide
« Reply #33 on: 19 December 2005, 14:24 »
I'm confused by this general conception that 20vT's have lag! With the k03(s)'d engines there was no such thing. The power delivery was so smooth you wouldn't even know it was a turbo.

We'll never know what mine was running previously. Guesses are around the 200bhp mark. It's going away in Jan for DTA standalone management and a k04 turbo setup aswell as rebuilding the bottom end with lower compression pistons to get the most from the k04. We should be seeing a reliable 280bhp so I've been told. It was sensible to swap out my k03s for the k04 at this point in time as it is going to save me another £500 in the future in the form of a further remap. Voodoo motorsport are doing work and if you've seen their work so far it's very impressive. They are doing me a good deal and their rep is holding up so far.

As for the mk2 20vT vs the mk2 VR6 I would put my money on the 20vT everytime. The VR6 is a heavy engine often increasing understear. The 20vT is a much lighter engine and with it's modern mangement and breathing produces a smooth power band throughout the revs.

Plus with the 20vT you have a ticket to 300bhp (if you buy a 225 engine in the first place). With the VR6 your options are very limited without big pockets.

When I was toying with the idea of selling mine a couple of months ago a lad made me an offer of his mk2 VR6 and cash against my mk2 20vT. Everyone said I would of lost the plot had I gone for it...
Mk4 Golf 150PD

Offline AudiA8Quattro

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,776
Re: mk2 vr6 and mk2 1.8t? who is the quickest? you decide
« Reply #34 on: 20 December 2005, 00:23 »
I think the real comparison should be the new vr6 v 1.8T as you are comparing new technology with old.
New vr6 3.2 24v produces around 240bhp out the factory  :huh:
At the end of the day its a matter of taste, both engines are very strong.
FOR DIY GUIDES GO TO <br>www.volkswagenaudi.co.uk<br/>BRAKES, SUSPENSION, CV JOINTS