GolfGTIforum.co.uk

General => Shows, events, track days, motorsport => Topic started by: Tim in Holland on 05 September 2008, 19:27

Title: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Tim in Holland on 05 September 2008, 19:27
Going to buy a mk3 golf as a tow car for my bike when taking it to the Nurburgring & a wet/damp weather track car for when it's a bit hairy to be out on the bike.

So what should I go for track day frequenters? (Sorry for those who have seen my similar thread in the Mk3 section)

Note: I'll be upgrading the pads and possibly discs, with a possible spring/damper firming up and and ARBs in the future, but that will be the limit (for now) in the way of track day mods (apart from decent tyres of course).
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 05 September 2008, 21:07
i would have said the 16v because you save a bit of weight over the front of the car, but dont know the real world difference  :huh:

the vr6 would be handy when towing though
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Diamond Hell on 06 September 2008, 22:39
Duh - if it's to make the most of moist, cold cruddy weather then go ifnd yourself a G3 Syncro - 4WD = faithful handling...... shame they were only available with either TDi or VR6 - surely how hard can it be to fit an ABF, eh?!

*cough* not that hard *cough*
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Tim in Holland on 07 September 2008, 10:29
There are no GTi/VR6 Syncros on the dutch autotrader, although there's a Mk2 G60 syncro for 12.5k euros  :rolleyes:

Valver sounds best for in the damp I think, and should be adequate for towing a light bike...
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Mook on 10 September 2008, 11:57
Going to buy a mk3 golf as a tow car for my bike when taking it to the Nurburgring & a wet/damp weather track car for when it's a bit hairy to be out on the bike.

Similar to a guy I saw there in July - he had an M5 tow car for his Ariel Atom.  Well kind of the same :wink:

If you want a quick car round the Ring, seriously consider a Mk2 GTI - 8V or 16V, or even one with a 20V turbo conversion.  Any one of them will tow a bike without any problems, and, in stock form they handle waaaay better than the stock Mk3, which, IMO, handles round a track with all the finesse of a tub of Flora.

Yes, you could spend a mint on mods on either car, but you'd be doing that anyway.

Mods you need to consider straightaway are brakes (disks and pads), plus anti-roll bars.  Both relatively inexpensive upgrades which will change your enjoyment of any track.  Brake fade on the Ring is horrible!
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Tim in Holland on 11 September 2008, 21:58
Just thinking, would the more constant power delivery of a VR6 be better in the damp than a revvy 16V?
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Mook on 14 September 2008, 07:21
In the damp, because of the extra torque, you'd need better throttle control with the VR6.

The VR6 is a much heavier car and understeers more than a 16V because of the additional weight of the engine. I've driven both cars in standard form on track and I would say the 16V is more fun.
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 14 September 2008, 12:38
the most important thing in the rain is to be light, so buy the lightest car that will still tow your bike ok
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Ivor Mk4 Turbo on 15 September 2008, 13:20
the most important thing in the rain is to be light, so buy the lightest car that will still tow your bike ok

At the front, yes, but a bit of weight in the middle/back can help in the rain, IMO.

Out of the 2, I would go 16v myself.
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 15 September 2008, 18:04
yeah, but i was hinting at choosing a different lighter car than a mk3, you can choose where you want the weight later.

sandbags in the boot?  :grin:
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Mook on 17 September 2008, 13:04
I was trying to stick to the Mk3 options, but, if I was to choose a Golf for towing and tracking, I'd go for a Mk2 16V or a Mk2 with a 20V conversion
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Ivor Mk4 Turbo on 17 September 2008, 13:43
yeah, but i was hinting at choosing a different lighter car than a mk3, you can choose where you want the weight later.

sandbags in the boot?  :grin:

Yes, Mk3 wouldn't be my choice either, TBH. :wink:
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Diamond Hell on 17 September 2008, 14:15
Yes, Mk3 wouldn't be my choice either, TBH.

G3 16V would be a lot cheaper to buy and make faster than a G4, especially on the 'ring.

Me, I'd still argue for a Syncro, especially having just come back from a damp weekend at the 'ring.  Mine sticks to the track like sh*t to a blanket, even on the diesel spill before Ex-Muhle.  It's rare I'd suggest a VR6, but given the non-availability of the ABF in Syncro flavour it'd be the way to go.
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Mook on 17 September 2008, 14:17
G3 16V would be a lot cheaper to buy and make faster than a G4, especially on the 'ring.

Or you could go for a G2, stick a 20VT engine in it and go quicker than both  :tongue:
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Diamond Hell on 17 September 2008, 14:27
A 20VT is a lot of work for a tow car.

Also in the damp it's unlikely something with that much power through the front wheels would be quicker on the 'ring..... unless you're into LSDs etc etc.
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Tim in Holland on 17 September 2008, 18:22
Another reason for going towards a Mk3 is the combination of being cheaper and lighter than a Mk4, but still very usable for every day type driving and longer trips (including down to the Alps for the odd bit of skiing) where a Mk2 might be a little more wearing. Also they're that bit newer than the Mk2. After all my main 'Ring vehicle is the bike, because cars lean the wrong way ;)

But cheers for the debate, if I stumble across a mint Mk2 16v I may still be tempted, but VR6 is still on my list.
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 17 September 2008, 19:05
After all my main 'Ring vehicle is the bike, because cars lean the wrong way ;)

thats cos of the extra grip  :grin: :tongue:
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Tim in Holland on 17 September 2008, 19:46
Well, just seen a syncro VR6 with the 2.9 fitted (were all syncros 2.9??) for sale, good miles and price. Just need to wait and see what's about for sale when I move out there.

I also found this "Dakar" style Mk2  :shocked:

http://autotelegraaf.nl/autokopen/toon/?id=12350113;resultset=113243451;referrer=resultaten;opnieuwZoeken=ownerId%3D196811%3Bwhitelabel%3Dautobedrijf%3Brandom%3D1221676970%3Bresultset%3D113243451%3Bstart%3D0%3BcategoryId%3D1%3BsortBy%3DvraagprijsLH%3BcategoryId%3D1;whitelabel=autobedrijf#top

And as for the bike grip thing, race you round the 'Ring bike v your golf ;)
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Diamond Hell on 17 September 2008, 20:22
I don't know the precise details of whether they're all 2.8 or 2.9, but I've seen 2.9 ones for sale before.

Bikes may lean the 'right' way, but I'd have been properly hacked off if I'd taken a bike this weekend - the track didn't open for them on Sunday or Monday!  With a bit of diesel and a bit of damp I was very happy to lean the wrong way.
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: Tim in Holland on 17 September 2008, 20:33
Good to know they came as a 2.9 in the syncro too.



I don't fancy the bike on the 'Ring in the wet/damp/slippy conditions, and like cars too, so why not just maximise the fun, hence my reason for the golf too :)
Title: Re: Track daying in the damp, Mk3 16v or VR6?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 17 September 2008, 20:36

And as for the bike grip thing, race you round the 'Ring bike v your golf ;)


hardly fair  :grin: a big roundabout would be a better test. dont worry i know how quick bikes are :wink: im just a car person.

i wouldnt discount a mk2 because of age. the mk3 is old now as well and the mk2 is supposedly the better built. a set of arb's and the koni shocks/eibach springs combo would give you decent handling and a fairly comfy car