GolfGTIforum.co.uk
Model specific boards => Golf mk5 => Topic started by: Hurdy on 12 April 2008, 00:01
-
Finally up guys. :cool:
Enjoy :smiley:
http://www.awesome-gti.co.uk/rollingroad/rr.gti_050408.html
-
Sounds good hurdy...im guessing yours is the one with Forge DV, APR Stage 1, Carbonio CAI, Full Milltek exhaust :P
-
btw....whos are the other cars there??
-
mines the steel grey 1 :grin:
-
Anyone notice the standard ED30 ( fourth down on the right) has more power than the car with just the Carbonio (top left). :shocked:
How many runs did they have with your car Hurdy?
-
If you look, it looks like a 1 off spike, the other 2 runs are very similar.
They did 3 runs with every car, I think they have posted previous runs from when the car has been there before, on mine there are about 6 runs and some are from before
-
Sounds good hurdy...im guessing yours is the one with Forge DV, APR Stage 1, Carbonio CAI, Full Milltek exhaust :P
Yes, you're correct :nerd:
-
btw....whos are the other cars there??
Member Car Colour
Daz16v VR6 Blue
MarkS MKII GTI 8V White
gazbutmk5gti MKV ED30 Steel grey
rik1985austin Corrado 2.0 16v Red
joesgti MKV GTI Black car with red centres
T880MM MKV ED30 white car
Neg MKV GTI Black lowered
Hurdy MKV ED30 Silver
T30GUE MKV GTI Black
john_o MKV ED30 Black
-
mines the 4th on right std ED30 and as gaz states Id take the average of the 3 runs.
It is interesting to compare mine and Toms (White ED30 with Carbonio)
Both manual cars
The shape of the curves are similar but different....
Mine has a much more noticebale drop off at 6k rpm onwards, but a larger bulge at 4500 rpm?
My car just gets its legs cut off at just over 6k rpm , whereas Toms doesnt , which can only be down to filter???
very interesting
I have also noticed that they both have a 'change' at 4200rpm , whereas the remapped ED30 dont have it or its much smoother. Until I looked at the remapped cars I thought it would be variable valve timing but maybe not??
Plan to overlay all ED30 maps for reference when I get a chance.
JohnO
-
Hurdy, your car appears to show a 111bhp difference between runs - 242bhp/352bhp, what would you say is your true output given the disparity between runs?
-
Hurdy, your car appears to show a 111bhp difference between runs - 242bhp/352bhp, what would you say is your true output given the disparity between runs?
The true readings were 304bhp. The disparities lie in the fact it is DSG and they have to knock it out of gear at the same time as taking their foot off the accellerator otherwise the spike or the dip gets added into the equation.
I'd love to say it was 352bhp :evil: but that would be cheating :grin:
-
:sad: :sad: :sad: im going back tomorrow :sad:
-
:sad: :sad: :sad: im going back tomorrow :sad:
Is that for the investigation into the possible leak/power loss?
-
The torque figures of the ED30 remaps are interesting.
I presume Hurdy's are lower due the DSG ?
Gaz's best : 315 ft-lbs (305 average of last 2)
Hurdy's best : 245 ft-lbs (243 average of last 2)
-
The torque figures of the ED30 remaps are interesting.
I presume Hurdy's are lower due the DSG ?
Gaz's best : 315 ft-lbs (305 average of last 2)
Hurdy's best : 245 ft-lbs (243 average of last 2)
The figures are out on the pics on the web. They adjusted them for errors and mine came out at an average of 275lbft. Still lower than the manual, but it makes me happier with the DSG box and all. :smiley:
-
Did the operator have any comments to make on each of the cars?
whos was voted the best map, highest bhp etc...?
-
No comments I'm afraid, apart from the two on the cars that were suffering a little.
-
No comments I'm afraid, apart from the two on the cars that were suffering a little.
O... So they didn't mention on what improvements if any could be gained from the dyno maps?
not even advise on how strong the boost was holding or dropping off?
i have been to many rolling road days and all of them have advised on the graphs and what will help improve the car and what needs to be removed.