GolfGTIforum.co.uk

General => General discussion => Topic started by: jonny_d on 14 December 2005, 20:56

Title: r32 vs mapped gti
Post by: jonny_d on 14 December 2005, 20:56

Do u think it would be a fair contest 0-60, round a track? etc what would win. i'm looking at the r32 being heavier therefore being a bit more sluggish?!?

Title: Re: r32 vs mapped gti
Post by: Neaty on 14 December 2005, 21:06

its got the advantages of 4 wheel drive traction tho

Title: Re: r32 vs mapped gti
Post by: jonny_d on 14 December 2005, 22:40

*Gti being a 1.8t.(How dumb am i?)

Yeah thats what i thought just wondered ppls opinions on the r32 in comparison to a car which is about 10 grand+ cheaper.

Title: Re: r32 vs mapped gti
Post by: Neaty on 14 December 2005, 22:43

I prefer the look of the GTI to be honest, and if i had one i probably would get it mapped to about 230bhp!

Title: Re: r32 vs mapped gti
Post by: jonny_d on 14 December 2005, 22:54

yeah ive got a 1.8t. tbh i really dont like the r32 looks wise, (Looks like a rice car). prefer the smooth lines of the gti. the only thing that outways the the 1.8t to the r32 is the 4wd.

Title: Re: r32 vs mapped gti
Post by: Neaty on 14 December 2005, 22:57

yea i really like the mark 4 R32 tho!