GolfGTIforum.co.uk

Model specific boards => Golf mk2 => Topic started by: coolio on 25 April 2013, 23:22

Title: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: coolio on 25 April 2013, 23:22
anyone knows which one ride and handle better ?
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: murraymint on 25 April 2013, 23:26
Same coilovers just different colour, buy the ones with the longest warranty
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: coolio on 25 April 2013, 23:28
Really ....the fk is nearly twice as much as the jom ones
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Diamond Hell on 26 April 2013, 08:41
Neither.  They'll be junk.
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Sgt_Lemon on 26 April 2013, 09:29
I have joms and there not that bad, anyone who says otherwise has too much money on their hands. They lower your car, they are stiff but not that much over stock suspension. Get new bushes all round and your good to go.
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Foreveryoungaus16v on 26 April 2013, 11:58
Both are budget coilovers.  U want performance/handling you need to speend £600 plus.
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: danny_p on 08 May 2013, 00:03
they are both crap in the handeling department. 

decent quality gas struts are far superior in the damping departments.     anyone who thinks cheep coilovers are an upgrade just had really knackerd suuspention beforehand,  a GTi will handel better on fresh stock shocks and springs than it will on cheep coilovers.   then try  better shocks  :wink:

i would avoid coilovers at all costs unless been abel to raise and lower car was an absolute must ( but the cheep ones sieze anyway so no more adjustable than a strut )  handeling wise you only need to upgrade to coilovers when you've got inverted monotube struts  and decide there not quite good enough for your race car
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: coolio on 08 May 2013, 00:41
they are both crap in the handeling department. 

decent quality gas struts are far superior in the damping departments.     anyone who thinks cheep coilovers are an upgrade just had really knackerd suuspention beforehand,  a GTi will handel better on fresh stock shocks and springs than it will on cheep coilovers.   then try  better shocks  :wink:

i would avoid coilovers at all costs unless been abel to raise and lower car was an absolute must ( but the cheep ones sieze anyway so no more adjustable than a strut )  handeling wise you only need to upgrade to coilovers when you've got inverted monotube struts  and decide there not quite good enough for your race car

so what setup have u got on ur car ?
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Diamond Hell on 08 May 2013, 14:36
He's got Bilstein B12 on the front and OEM Bilsteins on the back.
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: myv8growler on 09 May 2013, 20:25
I too am looking to lower our type 19 over the next couple of weeks.

Lowering is a must, ride quality not too much of a concern as its hardly used and only for short journeys. Its purely about the looks!

I have seen the JOMs, considered lowered springs with standard shocks and just seen some adjustable spring kits that fit over the original shocks.

I think I will go with the JOM ones as they seem reasonably popular for budget lowering.
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: danny_p on 10 May 2013, 00:19
srings and strurts do the job so much better .......
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Sgt_Lemon on 10 May 2013, 08:11
srings and strurts do the job so much better .......
Not if you only want to adjust the hight of the car
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: danny_p on 10 May 2013, 18:26
cheep coilovers only adjust once or twice,   dosent take them long to sieze.

they don't actualy last very long before the seals go and they leack,  you put them on a track car you'll kill them a few hundred track miles or about 10-15 k on the road

a cheep spring a shock kit of roughly the same price will actualy be quite reasonable quality and have a sensible service life, proably see you out a season or two on the track  or 5 - 10 years and 100k on the road,  car will also handel better.

Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: myv8growler on 12 May 2013, 21:15
I know it may offend you purists, but JOMs have been ordered and are on their way......
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Diamond Hell on 12 May 2013, 21:45
No, it's fine - you're buying sh*t for your car, not ours.
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: myv8growler on 12 May 2013, 22:05
ok, i'll take that
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: danny_p on 12 May 2013, 23:40
as said, it's your car, your money, your choice.

only offering advice based on whats been tryed and broken in the past

Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Diamond Hell on 13 May 2013, 10:49
It was FKs we put on my Golf last October, which threw up down themselves on the same day, wasn't it?  :grin:
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: danny_p on 13 May 2013, 23:14
indeed it was, fitted and broken on the same day  :evil:
Title: Re: jom vs fk ak street coilovers
Post by: Gti_Jamo on 13 May 2013, 23:36
If you can put up with the ride and are able to look after them they will be fine. The do seize quickly though and the coating on the springs will fall off. Although mine were heavily exposed to the winter. Done 1500 miles in them (not leaking or seized but look like an archaeologist just dug them up) before replacing them with AP's (400 quid) and had already done 5000 miles on previous car. Spring coating 100% intact. The difference in ride was substantial.