GolfGTIforum.co.uk
General => General discussion => Topic started by: The Mighty Elvi on 08 December 2011, 17:46
-
Nope..It didn't crash. They "overrode the controls"
:shocked:
Oops!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16098562
-
Awesome.
-
Oops-a-daisy :lipsrsealed:
-
Does it have self destruct? I've watched Steath.... :lipsrsealed:
-
Some hacker got bored.... and needed something a little more challenging!
-
The Xbox 360 controller that the US army use must have run out of batteries :laugh:
-
ooooooooooopssssss
-
i thourght it was small! untill they panned out! :o
dam!!!!!
-
So they'll now be able to build stealth nuclear weapons, good job guys :rolleyes:
-
Pentagon officials have said they are concerned about Iran possibly acquiring information about the technology.
Here's a suggestion - if you're concerned about Iran 'possibly acquiring information' about your clever clever equipemnt, maybe don't fly it over their country. :rolleyes:
-
Pentagon officials have said they are concerned about Iran possibly acquiring information about the technology.
Here's a suggestion - if you're concerned about Iran 'possibly acquiring information' about your clever clever equipemnt, maybe don't fly it over their country. :rolleyes:
Don't get me started on the nuclear issues a few years back :sick:
-
iran has lots of oil, so they blatantly have weapons of mass destruction, mr. president.
-
iran has lots of oil, so they blatantly have weapons of mass destruction, mr. president.
that will be there new excuse for another war
-
yep here we go middle east war round 3 over some more oil and drones.
-
When they showed me a map of Kwait and the troops landing for the first time, I could not keep my eyes off Iran as Topher said natural gas lines and oil reserves! Its the Yellow brick road or Black gold brick road! :rolleyes:
-
Slogans on banner read in Farsi "Death to America, death to Israel, death to England
-
I want one :grin:
-
Counter UAV perk lol
-
2012 here we come :wink: :laugh:
-
Counter UAV perk lol
GEEK :nerd: :grin:
-
Havent they sent in the Navy Seals yet to retrieve it?
Or a Cruise Missile to blow it up?
-
im suprised they havnt got something built in that destroys some of the tech or software in the event of something like this happening :shocked:
-
im suprised they havnt got something built in that destroys some of the tech or software in the event of something like this happening :shocked:
that will be due in v2. i.e. the iranian version
-
Iran have captured a remote contolled plane with a camera in it... this camera contains pictures off Iran :laugh:
-
Counter UAV perk lol
Looks more like the advanced UAV :P
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
Iran and the west have been at war for years, it will just step up to a new intensity.
We could have supported the uprisings a few years back but hey we had blown our credibility on Mr Hussiens 4 tanks of mass destruction....
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
Iran and the west have been at war for years, it will just step up to a new intensity.
We could have supported the uprisings a few years back but hey we had blown our credibility on Mr Hussiens 4 tanks of mass destruction....
But in reality its all just BS, playing games with one another with the only losers being more innocent civilians. The drone was more than likely meant to be captured for that very reason. This stuff bores me to death, just the same old cycle that goes on and on and on.
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
Iran and the west have been at war for years, it will just step up to a new intensity.
We could have supported the uprisings a few years back but hey we had blown our credibility on Mr Hussiens 4 tanks of mass destruction....
But in reality its all just BS, playing games with one another with the only losers being more innocent civilians. The drone was more than likely meant to be captured for that very reason. This stuff bores me to death, just the same old cycle that goes on and on and on.
I would just like to mention something about all this.. Theres not a lot I can say for obvious reasons but:
1. Current UAV's have return to base if lose of connection to pilot
2. The cameras aint cameras, they are direct feeds and hold no information on the UAV.
3. The US have not answered to this yet...
4. Please don't compare Afghanistan with Iraq as they were/are two totally different conflicts..
-
Maybe it got lost trying to find McDonalds?
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
Iran and the west have been at war for years, it will just step up to a new intensity.
We could have supported the uprisings a few years back but hey we had blown our credibility on Mr Hussiens 4 tanks of mass destruction....
But in reality its all just BS, playing games with one another with the only losers being more innocent civilians. The drone was more than likely meant to be captured for that very reason. This stuff bores me to death, just the same old cycle that goes on and on and on.
I would just like to mention something about all this.. Theres not a lot I can say for obvious reasons but:
1. Current UAV's have return to base if lose of connection to pilot
2. The cameras aint cameras, they are direct feeds and hold no information on the UAV.
3. The US have not answered to this yet...
4. Please don't compare Afghanistan with Iraq as they were/are two totally different conflicts..
Whats different about them?
-
Whats different about them?
At a punt.... oil and gas? :undecided:
-
As they say in COD.
STELLA STORJNA
:cool:
-
As they say in COD.
STELLA STORJNA
:cool:
And in other fights...
...STELLA ARTOIS :laugh:
-
Slogans on banner read in Farsi "Death to America, death to Israel, death to England
pheww.... i`m glad wales isnt on their list :laugh:
-
Whats different about them?
At a punt.... oil and gas? :undecided:
Not really different that though. Its still invading to acquire resources.
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
Iran and the west have been at war for years, it will just step up to a new intensity.
We could have supported the uprisings a few years back but hey we had blown our credibility on Mr Hussiens 4 tanks of mass destruction....
But in reality its all just BS, playing games with one another with the only losers being more innocent civilians. The drone was more than likely meant to be captured for that very reason. This stuff bores me to death, just the same old cycle that goes on and on and on.
I would just like to mention something about all this.. Theres not a lot I can say for obvious reasons but:
1. Current UAV's have return to base if lose of connection to pilot
2. The cameras aint cameras, they are direct feeds and hold no information on the UAV.
3. The US have not answered to this yet...
4. Please don't compare Afghanistan with Iraq as they were/are two totally different conflicts..
Whats different about them?
Please tell me you are taking the piss...
Do you have a clue what is going on in Afghanistan? Why we entered the place? What British Troops are currently doing out here. Before you enter into this bullsh!t its for the oil/gas crap, think about this, we will be withdrawing in the next 3-4 years, how the hell are we going to find then build then control all this so called oil and gas..
Afghanistan we a conflict that was entered into after 9/11 for two reasons.. 1. To smash up the training camps and to try cause as much disruption to the regime as possible. After this had occured, which was within a 6 month period, we were invited by the Afghan President to help stabilise the corrupt government and help to develop the country as the Talib has quite a strong hold of Afghan politics etc.. the last 9 years have been spent developing various aspects of the country and now 95% of Afghans have access to first aid posts in their villages. British soldiers have died building schools and trying to provide stability in the local villages so that the locals can be educated.
Afghanistan is nothing like Iraq. I suggest you do some reading before making sweeping statements.
-
Whats different about them?
At a punt.... oil and gas? :undecided:
Not really different that though. Its still invading to acquire resources.
Which is exactly what is going on.... despite which PR pack you were issued :rolleyes:
-
Whats different about them?
At a punt.... oil and gas? :undecided:
Not really different that though. Its still invading to acquire resources.
Which is exactly what is going on.... despite which PR pack you were issued :rolleyes:
Show me all this evidence of oil drilling/gas supplies that you are all harping on about..
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
Iran and the west have been at war for years, it will just step up to a new intensity.
We could have supported the uprisings a few years back but hey we had blown our credibility on Mr Hussiens 4 tanks of mass destruction....
Well Said :)
But in reality its all just BS, playing games with one another with the only losers being more innocent civilians. The drone was more than likely meant to be captured for that very reason. This stuff bores me to death, just the same old cycle that goes on and on and on.
I would just like to mention something about all this.. Theres not a lot I can say for obvious reasons but:
1. Current UAV's have return to base if lose of connection to pilot
2. The cameras aint cameras, they are direct feeds and hold no information on the UAV.
3. The US have not answered to this yet...
4. Please don't compare Afghanistan with Iraq as they were/are two totally different conflicts..
Whats different about them?
Please tell me you are taking the piss...
Do you have a clue what is going on in Afghanistan? Why we entered the place? What British Troops are currently doing out here. Before you enter into this bullsh!t its for the oil/gas crap, think about this, we will be withdrawing in the next 3-4 years, how the hell are we going to find then build then control all this so called oil and gas..
Afghanistan we a conflict that was entered into after 9/11 for two reasons.. 1. To smash up the training camps and to try cause as much disruption to the regime as possible. After this had occured, which was within a 6 month period, we were invited by the Afghan President to help stabilise the corrupt government and help to develop the country as the Talib has quite a strong hold of Afghan politics etc.. the last 9 years have been spent developing various aspects of the country and now 95% of Afghans have access to first aid posts in their villages. British soldiers have died building schools and trying to provide stability in the local villages so that the locals can be educated.
Afghanistan is nothing like Iraq. I suggest you do some reading before making sweeping statements.
-
Whats different about them?
At a punt.... oil and gas? :undecided:
Not really different that though. Its still invading to acquire resources.
Which is exactly what is going on.... despite which PR pack you were issued :rolleyes:
Show me all this evidence of oil drilling/gas supplies that you are all harping on about..
why dont you start by showing me the bit where we said we will fix your country for free :rolleyes:
-
I told you, they went over so that they can install some McDonalds and Pizza huts. I wonder if you can get a halal McDonalds?
-
I told you, they went over so that they can install some McDonalds and Pizza huts. I wonder if you can get a halal McDonalds?
Im sure you can... Pretty sure I have heard they do have them in some muslim countries. I would imagine its a special type of franchise though
-
This will be the beginning of the imminent so called war with Iran. First Afghanistan and Iraq, now Iran.
Iran and the west have been at war for years, it will just step up to a new intensity.
We could have supported the uprisings a few years back but hey we had blown our credibility on Mr Hussiens 4 tanks of mass destruction....
But in reality its all just BS, playing games with one another with the only losers being more innocent civilians. The drone was more than likely meant to be captured for that very reason. This stuff bores me to death, just the same old cycle that goes on and on and on.
I would just like to mention something about all this.. Theres not a lot I can say for obvious reasons but:
1. Current UAV's have return to base if lose of connection to pilot
2. The cameras aint cameras, they are direct feeds and hold no information on the UAV.
3. The US have not answered to this yet...
4. Please don't compare Afghanistan with Iraq as they were/are two totally different conflicts..
Whats different about them?
Please tell me you are taking the piss...
Do you have a clue what is going on in Afghanistan? Why we entered the place? What British Troops are currently doing out here. Before you enter into this bullsh!t its for the oil/gas crap, think about this, we will be withdrawing in the next 3-4 years, how the hell are we going to find then build then control all this so called oil and gas..
Afghanistan we a conflict that was entered into after 9/11 for two reasons.. 1. To smash up the training camps and to try cause as much disruption to the regime as possible. After this had occured, which was within a 6 month period, we were invited by the Afghan President to help stabilise the corrupt government and help to develop the country as the Talib has quite a strong hold of Afghan politics etc.. the last 9 years have been spent developing various aspects of the country and now 95% of Afghans have access to first aid posts in their villages. British soldiers have died building schools and trying to provide stability in the local villages so that the locals can be educated.
Afghanistan is nothing like Iraq. I suggest you do some reading before making sweeping statements.
No not taking the piss. I don't give a hoot about what the military agenda is in the middle east mate. I'm sure there are many factors and not just a basic strategy with a couple of goals. In reality, when it comes down to it, my concerns are with, A. the thousands and thousands of innocnent lives being sacrificed to service these agendas. And B. Why they were allowed to go to war. Regarding civilian deaths, children especially, which i'm not wrong about and can supply plenty evidence of it if you wish but i'm sure you will know already. I know portions of the military wether it be british or US troops do very good work out there but the costs, for me, far outweigh the benifits. 9/11 was set up to justify an invasion, everyone knows this now. It was no accident. The wars were not legal under international law, the UN authorised them regardless of security council resolution 678 Every rule in the book was broken to get them there.
-
9/11 was set up to justify an invasion, everyone knows this now.
Everyone knows this now? Do they really? :huh:
-
9/11 was set up to justify an invasion, everyone knows this now.
Everyone knows this now? Do they really? :huh:
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
-
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
A rough idea? :huh:
When citation is required to your 'everyone knows this', a rough idea doesn't really cut it.
-
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
A rough idea? :huh:
When citation is required to your 'everyone knows this', a rough idea doesn't really cut it.
But a rough idea of Bin Laden and Co. executing such a complex attack from a cave just because the bbc or the daily mail says so is perfectly acceptable and sheer gospel. Works both way does it not?
-
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
A rough idea? :huh:
When citation is required to your 'everyone knows this', a rough idea doesn't really cut it.
But a rough idea of Bin Laden and Co. executing such a complex attack from a cave just because the bbc or the daily mail says so is perfectly acceptable and sheer gospel. Works both way does it not?
I don't think the BBC or Daily mail had any infulence inside Whitehall, you know.
-
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
A rough idea? :huh:
When citation is required to your 'everyone knows this', a rough idea doesn't really cut it.
But a rough idea of Bin Laden and Co. executing such a complex attack from a cave just because the bbc or the daily mail says so is perfectly acceptable and sheer gospel. Works both way does it not?
I don't think the BBC or Daily mail had any infulence inside Whitehall, you know.
More likely the other way around mate.
-
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
A rough idea? :huh:
When citation is required to your 'everyone knows this', a rough idea doesn't really cut it.
But a rough idea of Bin Laden and Co. executing such a complex attack from a cave just because the bbc or the daily mail says so is perfectly acceptable and sheer gospel. Works both way does it not?
I don't think the BBC or Daily mail had any infulence inside Whitehall, you know.
More likely the other way around mate.
Look, you're not making any sense.
The other way round would be the BBC and the Mail reporting on what's going on, so what the hell has that got to do why why Whitehall decided the military went in? Nothing, that's what.
-
9/11 was set up to justify an invasion, everyone knows this now. It was no accident.
(http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS0AviOiUAbW3IgUf966gQJ7cWIXlNod9xV6_NeKFrEZNZ2sJsVbKTnnRx9AQ)
-
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
A rough idea? :huh:
When citation is required to your 'everyone knows this', a rough idea doesn't really cut it.
But a rough idea of Bin Laden and Co. executing such a complex attack from a cave just because the bbc or the daily mail says so is perfectly acceptable and sheer gospel. Works both way does it not?
I don't think the BBC or Daily mail had any infulence inside Whitehall, you know.
More likely the other way around mate.
Look, you're not making any sense.
The other way round would be the BBC and the Mail reporting on what's going on, so what the hell has that got to do why why Whitehall decided the military went in? Nothing, that's what.
I'm saying whitehall would have influence over the media.
-
Well most people now have a rough idea it was an 'inside job' anyway. Although inside job may not be the correct term. Basically i've not come across anyone who has looked at all the evidence and still believes the official story. Not that i'm saying I know how it was orchestrated but there are a number of scenarios with the official story being the least likely.
A rough idea? :huh:
When citation is required to your 'everyone knows this', a rough idea doesn't really cut it.
But a rough idea of Bin Laden and Co. executing such a complex attack from a cave just because the bbc or the daily mail says so is perfectly acceptable and sheer gospel. Works both way does it not?
I don't think the BBC or Daily mail had any infulence inside Whitehall, you know.
More likely the other way around mate.
Look, you're not making any sense.
The other way round would be the BBC and the Mail reporting on what's going on, so what the hell has that got to do why why Whitehall decided the military went in? Nothing, that's what.
I'm saying whitehall would have influence over the media.
And if they did? What the hell has that got to do with how this conversation started?
I think you've um, kinda lost the convo mate.
-
Your the one who brough up whitehall mate. Lets just leave it as that eh!! This convo is pointless.
-
ITS ALL
(http://i831.photobucket.com/albums/zz234/bricey25/bollox2.jpg)
-
ITS ALL
(http://i831.photobucket.com/albums/zz234/bricey25/bollox2.jpg)
This^^^^^
-
Your the one who brough up whitehall mate. Lets just leave it as that eh!! This convo is pointless.
I brought up the name Whitehall, as they tell us what to do, as you were saying why you think we went there.
-
oh well, this is just going to get Chuff'd
No BBC, no daily mail, no whitehall
Just Chuff
Have a nice day now :wink: