GolfGTIforum.co.uk
General => General discussion => Topic started by: Ant1981 on 10 October 2011, 18:12
-
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/father%E2%80%99s-photo-of-daughter-in-shopping-mall-sparks-security-dispute.html
:huh:
-
who the security guard or the guy taking the pict
-
who the security guard or the guy taking the pict
Um, lol, good sense of humour there, nearly had me tell you who I obviously meant :laugh:
-
who the security guard or the guy taking the pict
obviously the little girl. i mean tights tucked into the socks, does she not have any idea about fashion. jeez
-
there was a huge debate on this in the 'photography world' and the thing to remember is that photography is not a crime and can be carried out in any public place of anyone you wish, including the police
-
there was a huge debate on this in the 'photography world' and the thing to remember is that photography is not a crime and can be carried out in any public place of anyone you wish, including the police
have you saw the face book page about this to boy-cot breahead :grin: :grin:
-
This country is messed up man with things like this. I work for network rail and about 2 years ago we were sent to a job on the Olympic site in stratford but we couldn't find wot we were send there to do (because they sent us to the wrong area lol) any way I rang my supervisor told him we couldnt find anthing, and he said to take some photos off of the road bridge looking down track so they could get the signal number just to make sure, and within 5 mins of taking the first picture the police were there and they hand cuffed every one told us we were committing a crime by taking photos of the railway tracks we could be terrorists scoping the area (bearing in mind we were in a network rail van and all in Bright orange) they searched the van from top to bottom we must have been there a good 3 hours and then they got on to our office and our supervisor explained wot we we're doing there and then they let us go lol if they had listened to us in the first place we could have saved alot of time and trouble but atleast we got the rest of the day off
-
Yeah big uproar about year ago where lots of photographers taking pics with dSLR cameras were being interrogated by the police but those with compact cameras were left alone. As above, it was all about terrorism. Surely if a terrorist want to take pics, they could now use a compact camera - especially as the IQ can be very good these days?
Muppets.
-
http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=207806.0
only kidding
-
http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=207806.0
only kidding
You have a valid point though. Some mothers do 'ave 'em.
-
saw the thread title, and wondered which one of the many forum members you might have been talking about :lipsrsealed:
-
you got plenty of catching up to do Chuff
-
you got plenty of catching up to do Chuff
nope, all done, see you in 10 days :kiss:
-
when, where, why?
-
As a photographer myself, I experience this kind of thing on a daily basis. It's mainly due to the Internet and Digital cameras. The amount of times people have asked "is this going on the internet? where?". Film is so innocent because once you've printed it, it's usually just the 1 print, so people aren't as bothered. It does make for some interesting photo's tho :)