GolfGTIforum.co.uk
General => General discussion => Topic started by: jnufcuk on 07 July 2011, 17:02
-
Dont know if anyone knows but came across this yesterday, might be of interest:
http://supermade.wordpress.com/category/photography/
-
Some nice pics there.
But is it just me that doesn't like this look?
Too low, I dont like the huge gaps at the bottom of the arches.
(http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/5291/587976195742177484f4x.jpg)
-
Theres some on here too
http://www.volkswagenracing.co.uk/Tuning%20General%20Pages/Gallery%20Home.html
-
Some nice pics there.
But is it just me that doesn't like this look?
Too low, I dont like the huge gaps at the bottom of the arches.
(http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/5291/587976195742177484f4x.jpg)
Yeah, that looks just terrible :rolleyes:
Thom
-
Some nice pics there.
But is it just me that doesn't like this look?
Too low, I dont like the huge gaps at the bottom of the arches.
(http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/5291/587976195742177484f4x.jpg)
Yeah, that looks just terrible :rolleyes:
Thom
yep.. looks gash
but i quite like this though
(http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/5761/img8597x.jpg)
-
Yeah I think thats the mk1 tdi that was on the cover of PVW a few months back?
Seen it at a few shows, proper tidy
-
The one and only Greg Howells car :cool:
Thom
-
Gregs mk1. Very hard to find a paint blemish on that car.
Best mk1 about :smiley:
-
http://supermade.wordpress.com/category/photography/page/6/
patch :cool: :lipsrsealed:
-
Some nice pics there.
But is it just me that doesn't like this look?
Too low, I dont like the huge gaps at the bottom of the arches.
(http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/5291/587976195742177484f4x.jpg)
Yeah, that looks just terrible :rolleyes:
Thom
Bet it cost a lot of money to get it looking that sh¡t.
-
(http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/5986/dsc0988202.jpg)
:shocked: :tongue:
DO WANT
-
Some nice pics there.
But is it just me that doesn't like this look?
Too low, I dont like the huge gaps at the bottom of the arches.
(http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/5291/587976195742177484f4x.jpg)
Yeah, that looks just terrible :rolleyes:
Thom
Bet it cost a lot of money to get it looking that sh¡t.
Proof money can't buy you taste!
-
As the Mk6 section has proven time and time again. :lipsrsealed:
Haha, nah... I jest. :wink: :kiss:
-
Some nice pics there.
But is it just me that doesn't like this look?
Too low, I dont like the huge gaps at the bottom of the arches.
(http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/5291/587976195742177484f4x.jpg)
Yeah, that looks just terrible :rolleyes:
Thom
Bet it cost a lot of money to get it looking that sh¡t.
Proof money can't buy you taste!
You do actually realise why it has big spaces between the wheels and the bumpers, don't you?
Thom
-
Yes.
Because it's so low! :tongue:
That's what I'm getting at, because it's so low, there's a big gap between the bottom of the wheel and the bottom of the arch (where it meets the bumper)
If the car wasn't as low it wouldn't have such a large void there because the space would be filled with a wider part of the wheel.
-
......and it still looks sh!t :laugh:
-
I prefer the OEM look with my vee dubyas.
-
Yes.
Because it's so low! :tongue:
That's what I'm getting at, because it's so low, there's a big gap between the bottom of the wheel and the bottom of the arch (where it meets the bumper)
If the car wasn't as low it wouldn't have such a large void there because the space would be filled with a wider part of the wheel.
It's the wide angle camera lens you divvy!
-
Yes.
Because it's so low! :tongue:
That's what I'm getting at, because it's so low, there's a big gap between the bottom of the wheel and the bottom of the arch (where it meets the bumper)
If the car wasn't as low it wouldn't have such a large void there because the space would be filled with a wider part of the wheel.
It's the wide angle camera lens you divvy!
I know that has affected it too, but it's the same without a fancy lens too!
(http://www.speedmotiv.com/posts/743/images/2drt113.jpg)
(http://www.airsociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/mk4-jetta-wagon-air-suspension-bagged-002.jpg)
The rears generally look ok, but too low at the front and they just look f**ked!
-
Yeah you're right it does look sh!te, perhaps spats should make a retro comeback? :smiley:
-
Gregs mk1. Very hard to find a paint blemish on that car.
You shouldn't be able to find any at all, but sadly as with most "show cars" in the vw scene this is not the case.
A couple of my best mates are painters and they are always disappointed at the paint quality on a lot of the "top" cars.
Nick
-
Yes.
Because it's so low! :tongue:
That's what I'm getting at, because it's so low, there's a big gap between the bottom of the wheel and the bottom of the arch (where it meets the bumper)
If the car wasn't as low it wouldn't have such a large void there because the space would be filled with a wider part of the wheel.
It's the wide angle camera lens you divvy!
I know that has affected it too, but it's the same without a fancy lens too!
(http://www.speedmotiv.com/posts/743/images/2drt113.jpg)
(http://www.airsociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/mk4-jetta-wagon-air-suspension-bagged-002.jpg)
The rears generally look ok, but too low at the front and they just look f**ked!
robin reliants never had this problem...
(http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y192/johnnysomersett/robin.jpg)
-
:grin: :grin: :grin:
I suppose those dubs would never have the 'balance issues' of the reliants!