GolfGTIforum.co.uk

Model specific boards => Golf mk2 => Topic started by: dibdub on 06 July 2011, 20:36

Title: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: dibdub on 06 July 2011, 20:36
In the market for new mk2 gti 16v and was debating spending the extra bit and go for a wolfsburg g60?


Has anyone else had a g60?

What are you views on which is the better?or what do people prefer who have been lucky enough to own both. :grin:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Lewy on 06 July 2011, 20:48
Wolfsburg G60?

Wolfsburg is where the VW Factory is and where the Mk2 was made, nothing else.

The supercharger on the G needs a re-con every 40k and from the factory they were pushing out 160bhp whereas the 16v was 139bhp.  The G60 sounds like a scalded cat, or if you are lucky enough to own a Bahn Brenner charged G, a sreaming dying cat!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL_g7YtBRQI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL_g7YtBRQI)

Remember that all 'real' G60 Golfs were LHD so if you're not prepared to put up with that, a 16v or a converted G60 mk2 is the way ahead.
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: pigbladder on 06 July 2011, 20:57
i own a 16v gti and an edition one g60

id say value wise the 16v is the best bet , its got enough power to be fun , but good on fuel and theyre reliable , common enough for spares etc

the g60 has a bit more power , few differant bits from the factory like strengthed chassis legs and the high tunnel , bonded screen etc , but theyre a bugger on fuel and the charger needs coslty servicing, the lhd doesnt bother me a bit though
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Wayne on 06 July 2011, 21:05
A nice valver ftw  :cool:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Simeon on 06 July 2011, 21:55
Charger servicing isn't that expensive, about £400 and needs doing every 3 years or so depending on how much you use it. Much more fun to drive than a 16v and forget the 160bhp ... 68mm pulley and remap (+ a cam and decent exhaust perhaps) and you'll see a reasonable increase - leave a valver for dead ;)

For better fuel economy you can put a diesel 'box in.

Better vid of Lysholm charger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SafUg_qsHeA
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Wayne on 06 July 2011, 23:29
Better vid of Lysholm charger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SafUg_qsHeA

Fook me that looks quick  :smiley:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: The Mighty Elvi on 07 July 2011, 10:47
Sounds like my old Tamiya Avante.

Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: AudiA8Quattro on 07 July 2011, 12:30
Depends on how deep your pockets are, i would go for an 16v.
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Sam on 07 July 2011, 12:48
All about the 16vt  :cool:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Organisys on 07 July 2011, 12:51
Will the car be used everyday, or just as a toy ?
 :smiley:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Sam on 07 July 2011, 12:55
Will the car be used everyday, or just as a toy ?
 :smiley:

Daily toy?  :evil:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Mr Blue on 07 July 2011, 14:52
man up and G60 LHD it.  :cool:

My next purchase
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: SoundillusioN on 07 July 2011, 15:53
man up and G60 LHD it.  :cool:

My next purchase

The best there is!

(http://gtitoolbox.com/files/Mk2GolfLtd.JPG)
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 07 July 2011, 19:19
Rhd, tuned 20vt more like..
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: cняis on 07 July 2011, 20:16
Rhd, tuned 20vt more like..

Meh drove a 20vT the other day (albeit in an S3) and found it a bit boring  :grin:

But that could be because it's modern and therefore not as raw as a mk2  :cool:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: jamrock on 07 July 2011, 21:05
how about a 16v ABF in a mk2??

Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 07 July 2011, 22:29
For ease and cost, abf is hard to beat, for all out time + money a 20vt with a few trick bits including lsd brakes + big turbo is awesome. Very awesome, will ruin an s3 as well...
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Sam on 08 July 2011, 08:34
For ease and cost, abf is hard to beat, for all out time + money a 20vt with a few trick bits including lsd brakes + big turbo is awesome. Very awesome, will ruin an s3 as well...

Limited Skid Disk Brakes?  :laugh:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: SoundillusioN on 08 July 2011, 09:32
For ease and cost, abf is hard to beat, for all out time + money a 20vt with a few trick bits including lsd brakes + big turbo is awesome. Very awesome, will ruin an s3 as well...

Limited Skid Disk Brakes?  :laugh:
I want some of those! :afro:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 08 July 2011, 11:59
Sorry! Lsd, brakes and big turbo. You picky ballbag rash
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: SoundillusioN on 08 July 2011, 12:02
Sorry! Lsd, brakes and big turbo. You picky ballbag rash

 :laugh:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Organisys on 08 July 2011, 12:04
if it's a daily I'd say 16v, pref an ABF if you can find one.

G60 likes a drink, see ?

 :smiley:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 08 July 2011, 13:17
My kjet abf + heavy right foot also equals an expensive car to fuel!! £10 a day, for less than 40 miles!! Beating the modern car mugs is worth it though..
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: cняis on 08 July 2011, 13:46
Cue the ABF w/kjet bashing!  :grin:

Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: SoundillusioN on 08 July 2011, 13:47
Cue the ABF w/kjet bashing!  :grin:



ABF K-jet FTW then  :grin:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: jamrock on 08 July 2011, 14:36
http://www.clubgti.com/forum/showthread.php?t=238236

this looks a good un
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: SoundillusioN on 08 July 2011, 15:00
http://www.clubgti.com/forum/showthread.php?t=238236

this looks a good un

Sensible money.  :smiley:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 08 July 2011, 17:07
So far the kjet is the only thing that's been problem free with my car, other than the not so great mpg.. If the 160bhp I had rr'd is accurate and I'm pushing more than a standard digi abf then for over engineering the control to make slightly better bhp with less power isn't worth it imo. I've seen a lot of head scratching posts due to the digi setup, my kjet I now understand, and can test and fault find (should I need to) quite easily, digi requires a bit more electrical knowledge which people expecting plug and play don't always have. I like kjet, so does my old school rr man. When optimised it aint so bad...
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Simeon on 08 July 2011, 17:58
...but it needs optimising regularly and what is this 150bhp abf figure all about? Decat and decent exhaust alone and you'll see 160bhp, add a 4bar fpr and a chip and you'll see 170ish.

However, G60 still makes sense as you can see 200-220 without too much hassle :)
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: danny_p on 09 July 2011, 11:13
to get K jet absolutly cock on just takes to much effort TBH.

you have to check every singel part of the system to ensure it's working correctly and replace or rebuild if it isn't.  that can cost a few £'s

then it needs setting up right and i don't mean jut the contol pressures and CO,  there is adjustement for trimmiing each injector its something a lot of people never bother doing and it's supriseing how far the setting can stray over time.  top reason for K jet abf's eatingn pistons even tho there set up "perfectly".

all it needs is 1 injector to spray a bit less and another to spray more and even tho the overall lambda reading is correct one cyl can be lean,  pop the injectors out pu them in measuring tubes and wedge the metering flap open odds on the tubes are going to fill at diffrent rates.  twerk the littel screws so they ll fill at the same rate and it'll go better.

personaly i prefer electronic managment far easyer imo
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 10 July 2011, 07:55
I bet a g60 mk2 is a lot of fun, it was good in the corrado minus the rubbish gear ratios and high fuel consumption.

I suppose it will be like the 8v vs 16v arguments, those who favour the 8v will prefer the g60, those who favour the 16v will prefer the abf.
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: cняis on 10 July 2011, 10:21
As above, do you prefer the lazy. bottom-endyness of a single cam unit. or enjoy working the engine to get the most out of it?
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: pigbladder on 10 July 2011, 11:13
you can run a decent well maintained 16v about all day long like you stole it bouncing it off the rev limiter etc and it will take it , if it blows your looking at under £200 to get another used engine

g60's dont like to be abused and you stand a good chance of damaging the charger if you use it hard , plus its £££ to fix it if/when you blow it 
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: danny_p on 10 July 2011, 11:25
after much thinking.

for a toy i think id have a g60 actualy.

reason been i've had a lot of 16v stuff now, there is more bhp in the g60. 

if i din't like it i don't think itd take long for a 16v head to find itself been fitted and if the charger went nucler oh well theres allways eatons 
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: delirical on 13 July 2011, 16:17
I have a mk2 8v g60 (as per sig) stage 4 charger, small pulley, manifold etc etc.

Its a lot of fun and i highly recommend you get one, im due to get it on the rolling rd this weekend so will let you know how it goes.

Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Andy P on 13 July 2011, 20:49
I have a mk2 8v g60 (as per sig) stage 4 charger, small pulley, manifold etc etc.

Its a lot of fun and i highly recommend you get one, im due to get it on the rolling rd this weekend so will let you know how it goes.



Is yours a genuine LHD g60? Or a g60'd GTI?
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: bodga on 13 July 2011, 21:22
you can run a decent well maintained 16v about all day long like you stole it bouncing it off the rev limiter etc  and it will take it , if it blows your looking at under £200 to get another used engine

g60's dont like to be abused and you stand a good chance of damaging the charger if you use it hard , plus its £££ to fix it if/when you blow it 

Is there a rev limiter on the 16v? ive never red lined mine, i keep it over 4k revs  and just before the red ftw. i keep the rev limiting stuff for the company car :laugh:

I suppose there no turbo lag on the G60? I drove a scooby once, sti prodrive, fooking loads of lag but neck breaking boost after the wait :grin: :grin: :grin: Like my valver, have to keep the revs up, but more fun
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: AudiA8Quattro on 13 July 2011, 21:45
No turbo lag, its supercharged so belt driven, instant boost.
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: delirical on 14 July 2011, 08:39
I have a mk2 8v g60 (as per sig) stage 4 charger, small pulley, manifold etc etc.

Its a lot of fun and i highly recommend you get one, im due to get it on the rolling rd this weekend so will let you know how it goes.



Is yours a genuine LHD g60? Or a g60'd GTI?

Yea as you say mate its a gti'd G60. Got a great spec tho from uprated brakes + braided lines, i.cooler, oil cooler, catch tank, full zorst. etc

As said above its great for low down power, i end up short shifting all the time as you dont need to go above 5k, makes a change from owning a Itg type R previously  :laugh:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: lemski on 14 July 2011, 13:59
I'd go with the 16valve as my mate has a g60'd gti and its slower. He cant leavr me in bottom gears and top gears he just gets in the way. That day he was not happy. But if it was for a toy only a fully tweaked g60 lhd would be were I would go
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 14 July 2011, 14:29
Why does everyone want a lhd g60. I'd probably pay more for a rhd, so I could overtake properly on our roads! Don't mention originality either because most people tune them and change bits...just to be different I'm guessing?!
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Diamond Hell on 14 July 2011, 19:05
High centre tunnel, bonded windscreen and reinforced front chassis legs all = much stifferer shell.

If you know, you know  :wink:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Mr Blue on 14 July 2011, 19:27
Why does everyone want a lhd g60. I'd probably pay more for a rhd, so I could overtake properly on our roads! Don't mention originality either because most people tune them and change bits...just to be different I'm guessing?!


I just want one for the sake of the comfortable LHD seating position  :laugh:

Stripped back a G60 shell the other week and they have lots of stronger bits around the whole shell as DH said. Also ABS and other refinements.

Would love a mint aubergine example  :smiley:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: pigbladder on 14 July 2011, 19:50
lhd makes bugger all differance , its no biggie and its nice to have a proper factory car with the little add ons like the chassis legs beefed up , screen and abs 
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 14 July 2011, 21:30
Ok I stand corrected, didn't realise the shells were physically stronger! Niiice! Never driven a lhd but I'd imagine its harder to see ahead for overtaking on some roads
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: pigbladder on 15 July 2011, 09:10
can be slightly worse but its made to sound worse by people that havent driven one

often you can see through the windows or down the other side , remember your head is only about 2 foot from its rhd place  , feels a bit more natrual to use your right hand to change gear too

id not let it bother you if you ever consider a lhd car , after a hour its fine
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 15 July 2011, 09:35
Sweet. Their used to be a lot of dutch import (aiii) mk3 vr6's round my way, all left hookers, used to think they'd be having a nightmare.. 
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: bodga on 15 July 2011, 19:49
A LHD is worst for the front seat passenger, its wierd, was in a left hooker mk1 golf years ago and i was looking for the steering wheel and pedals whilst my mate had his right foot to the floor :grin:
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Wayne on 15 July 2011, 23:43
I have driven a few lhd cars, as Danny said you soon get used to it.
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 16 July 2011, 09:07
how are the chassis legs reinforced in a g60? pics if anyone has them!
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: pigbladder on 16 July 2011, 10:26
if you imagine the end of the leg is a square , they have a brace welded in like /  even then bumper brackers differ

floor has the syncro tunnel even on 2wd models
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: VeeDubGTI16v on 16 July 2011, 10:49
ah i see!
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 16 July 2011, 15:02
So is the rallye beefier too? Are g60's/rallyes the same purely apart from rear quarters and wings etc then?
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Lewy on 17 July 2011, 14:56
4WD?
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 17 July 2011, 16:02
I meant shell wise. I know they're quite different otherwise
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: Diamond Hell on 18 July 2011, 17:18
No, the shell's significantly reinforced, which is part of the problem with the Rallye.

It's heavy.
Title: Re: gti 16v vs g60?
Post by: mk2bal on 18 July 2011, 17:35
Was thinkin that myself. Unnecessarily strengthened means unnecessarily heavier...