GolfGTIforum.co.uk

Model specific boards => Golf mk4 => Topic started by: snifferdog on 13 May 2011, 14:41

Title: Why did VW replace the 1.8 20v with the 2.0?
Post by: snifferdog on 13 May 2011, 14:41

As above. I have been reading alot of reviews of the mk4 gti since I got one and it seems that the majority of people think that replacing the 1.8 20v N/A with the 2.0 8v was a step backwards from VW.

I know that the 1.8 was criticised in early tests for its lack of low down torque but did this have anything to do with it?

Title: Re: Why did VW replace the 1.8 20v with the 2.0?
Post by: Horney on 13 May 2011, 14:46

2.0 8v 99-06
1.8 20v 97-03

Nick

Title: Re: Why did VW replace the 1.8 20v with the 2.0?
Post by: snifferdog on 13 May 2011, 14:48

Quote from: Horney on 13 May 2011, 14:46

2.0 8v 99-06
1.8 20v 97-03

Nick

I didnt know that! I thought that the 2.0 replaced the 1.8 in 99/00  :laugh: :embarassed:

Title: Re: Why did VW replace the 1.8 20v with the 2.0?
Post by: Wayne on 13 May 2011, 15:16

1.8 20v is still the better choice even in n/a form

Title: Re: Why did VW replace the 1.8 20v with the 2.0?
Post by: GJSEB79 on 13 May 2011, 22:43

i disagree i have two 1.8 20v n/a now s an i since bought my wife a 2.0 8v and it feels a much better drive than the 1.8 quicker and more rsponsive really is in my opinion

Title: Re: Why did VW replace the 1.8 20v with the 2.0?
Post by: snifferdog on 14 May 2011, 07:03

I will agree that it is more drievable as the torque is more readily available but they're a bit too slow, id rather work a bit harder and have the 1.8 which does actually produce a kick higher in the rev band. I think we all know that the turbo is the one to have anyway.