GolfGTIforum.co.uk

General => General discussion => Topic started by: monkeyalan on 22 October 2010, 00:06

Title: big or small ?
Post by: monkeyalan on 22 October 2010, 00:06
they go mental for small bumpers on mk2's here in Oz cos they never had them.

whats your preference?
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: SoundillusioN on 22 October 2010, 00:15
Big because mk1 did small to death... although i do like older mk2s with small bumpers! ahhh i dont know.  :grin: i voted big
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Cov golf on 22 October 2010, 12:42
I voted small just because I like small but if you where on about tits it would have to be big for me
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: lewis1641 on 22 October 2010, 13:53
early mk 2's, small. late mk 2's big!

lewis1641, sitting on the fence since 1978
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: tech1889 on 22 October 2010, 13:54
i said leave it with what it came out factory with..
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Wayne on 22 October 2010, 15:05
Small bumpers ftw  :smiley:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: harney123 on 22 October 2010, 15:14
i said big because big's always best  :smiley:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Jimp on 22 October 2010, 16:45
I love small bumper mk2s but the big bumper later GTIs look mean  :evil:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: lemski on 22 October 2010, 17:29
Small bumpers if I had a set layin about. Just makes the car look standard. Perfect for sleepers.
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Mitching on 23 October 2010, 12:44
Factory, but voted big.
Love the 90 spec!
Not a fan of 80 spec with big bumpers, just not right!
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: raferackstraw on 23 October 2010, 21:29
small for me cos the 89 16v i had back in the day had them  :wink:
small bumper = less weight    always a good thing  :wink:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: xkaty_h on 23 October 2010, 21:38
Big bumper for me.

I think they look odd with small bumpers.  :undecided:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Mikesps on 24 October 2010, 09:34
Big bumper. Just looks better imo  :cool:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: lemski on 09 November 2010, 20:56
Who would put big bumpers on a early golf
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: tsr_adi on 09 November 2010, 22:05
factory for me, but I prefer smalls, they suit the "age" of the design. But imo all alpine white mk2s should be small bumpered  :cool:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: luke on 09 November 2010, 22:13
I like big bumpers, but then I also like small bumpers, FIGHT!
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Diamond Hell on 09 November 2010, 22:36
small bumper = less weight    always a good thing  :wink:

I think you may find you are wrong.

I can't vote - there is no Andywash option.
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Peej1981 on 10 November 2010, 08:15
Big bumpers for me but that is cause i have them on mine and think they look better then the small ones, they make the mk2 look a lot fatter.  :grin:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: Ninja on 10 November 2010, 10:11
Old style - small. Mirrors look out of place otherwise.

90Spec - Big. It's the only way.

My 89 Had big ones fitted. Looked the dogs.
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: tsr_adi on 10 November 2010, 16:52
I reckon big bumpers nly look right if the arches and skirts are fitted, otherwise they look out of place. You know who you are mk2 driver owners  :grin:
Title: Re: big or small ?
Post by: lemski on 10 November 2010, 17:27
I've only got big bumpers cos my small bumpers got smashed up. But I andt got a driver ne more. Haha