GolfGTIforum.co.uk
Model specific boards => Golf mk3 => Topic started by: davero on 30 August 2009, 01:11
-
I know it has been asked many times before, but it is always interesting to know why people
chose it over other marks:
For me it is asthetics, I think it is a beautiful car and in gti or vr6 form, it does everything i want from a car.
I personally think the 16v is the best mk 3, for all round performance, but i Love the vr6 sound.
-
Many Mk2's had burnt a hole in my pocket, my Fav Vlaver got splatted by a Mini.
MK3 was immac at the time, one owner FSH and 2k spent on MOT at VW.
Traded fun/speed for less spend and pushing :smiley:
-
Ive got a Mk2 and lal my mates have mk3's but im goign to be biased and say the mk3's are too boxey and ugly imo only. But for some reason the mk3 gti seems slower than the mk2 and their suposed to be lighter i think
-
i've had one mk2(16v), 3 mk3's and 2 mk4's. The mk 2 was the best drivers car , the mk4 was the most comfortable.
But a well set up(and rust proofed mk 3) is the best compromise in my most humble opinion.
-
I had one as it was the buy for my budget at the time.
-
Ive got a Mk2 and lal my mates have mk3's but im goign to be biased and say the mk3's are too boxey and ugly imo only. But for some reason the mk3 gti seems slower than the mk2 and their suposed to be lighter i think
The mk3s are heavier than mk2s.
-
Mk4 is too expensive and don't trust the high mileage of mk2s :wink:
Nah, really I think the mk3 is a great car. It might not be the fastest, but that's not what I'm after *cough*
-
Bit of a long story but worth a read..
Well, being young, I was trying to get the best car for myself.
I was 16 and had bought myself a Mk2 Golf 1.6 CL for 20 quid. I was on a budget so I spent approximately 120 quid modifying it and my dad slapped an MOT on it as my 17th birthday present. Then somebody I knew with a Mk3 was after a different car, and said he really liked the look of my Mk2, so he wondered if I'd swap with him, and 300 quid cash my way! Needless to say, I ripped his arm off and became the proud owner of an L reg Mk3 Golf 1.4 Ryder which was 4/5 years newer than the Mk2 I'd just got rid of.
After spending time modding it and generally looking after it, I became attatched to it and didn't think I'd ever get rid of it, until somebody came and offered me 1600 quid for it :shocked: Once again, I ripped his arm off because I knew it wasn't worth anywhere near that, and I knew I could get another Mk3 Golf and have about a grand left over to modify it. So the car went, and the following day I picked up a P reg Mk3 Golf SE, I did nearly all the mods I did to the previous one, but this time around, I could afford coilovers, HID's and much more, so the finished item was better than my previous attempt.
I became attatched to that but it only ever brought me bad luck. I was stopped by the police in it 3 times, and it was getting on and needed work which I couldn't afford. The guy I'd sold my Mk3 Golf Ryder to, was in need of another Mk3, as his had been stolen and burnt out! So when he offered me 1400 quid for it, I had a think about it and decided to let it go because I wanted a Mk4. Nothing ever came of that though because Mk4's were too expensive, and I soon ended up with another poxy Mk3.
-
Nothing wrong with the mk3, even though some people on here like to bash them all the time :rolleyes:
Best model is vr6 for all round performance :smiley:
-
I never considered the VW scene, but my uncle got a Siliver Mk3 GTI, was a fairly nice car. And at the time i had just came back from travelling.
So i looked into them, found this forum and started looking at the VW Scene and mk3s and other mks.
Got a job, and saved up to buy my Mk3.
I do like a mk2, but it couldn't be a daily.
-
Ive got a Mk2 and lal my mates have mk3's but im goign to be biased and say the mk3's are too boxey and ugly imo only. But for some reason the mk3 gti seems slower than the mk2 and their suposed to be lighter i think
dont think you know alot really :rolleyes: 1. how is a more rounded shaped car more 'boxy' than an hard lined shed(mk2) 2. mk2 is lighter/better handling than a mk3 fact
-
Lets face it, a nice mk1 is silly money, a nice mk2 is silly money, and i really like mk4's but wouldnt own one. The mk3 is a nice affordable car and the money i paid for mine was nothing really for its age and condition. Its been SUPER reliable and a joy to own.
It isnt fast, isnt a great handling car, maybe not the prettiest either but what is for that kind of money. The MK3 gets a bum wrap and i cant really see why.
-
Ive got a Mk2 and lal my mates have mk3's but im goign to be biased and say the mk3's are too boxey and ugly imo only. But for some reason the mk3 gti seems slower than the mk2 and their suposed to be lighter i think
a mk2 weight is 950kg
a mk3 weight is 1250
thats why there alot slower than a mk2
mk2's are the best golf gti for sheer excitment and seat of the pants driving coz you really have to be on the ball and grab it by the scruff of the kneck.
Mk3's brake and handle better but lack the character and class of a mk2.
You buy a mk3 coz at the time you couldnt afford a mk4 or because you got fed up of a mk2 as a daily...there really a 2nd car these days hence my reason for buying a mk8 8v coz there cheap and my mk2 is in hiding for the winter with fooked engine.
Also an 8v mk2 leaves an 8v mk3 standing it really is alot faster and keeps up with the mk3 valvers until it hits 4th when the mk3 16v top end torque opens up to let just about take over on a 1/4 mile there really isnt much in it...
Dave
-
IMO the Mk3 looks meaner than all the subsequent golf's :angry:
Oh, and because I can't afford a porsche :laugh: :drool:
-
Because you can get ABS and air-con as standard.
Looks better modified. A Mk1 and Mk2 look better left fairly standard.
A Mk4 is a fat arsed granny car thats super soft!
-
imo lowered polished to within an inch of its life couple subtle mods, wheels (you like) = winner. get them cheap enough and plenty good ones around, great mpg from 8v and reliable. Oh cheap too run, people talk too you on the street(vw fans) and good daily commuter. agian with the not the fastest but if driven right and not againt silly power can do well, at least put a bit of a worry on a face or 2 ha ha.
oh yeah and i too cant afford a porsche. but can beat one silly on my gsxr ha ha. win win
-
I have to say aestheticly mk3 is top notch, it is smother looking than the previous generations and looks alot more agressive and youthful compared to the newer models, which I belive look all together too tame.
-
the only reason for me purchasing a mk3 golf was for the mrs. she seems happy enough with her golf cabby though. i would have prefered a mk1 shape, but she wanted a reasonably safe car, plus the mk3 shape is a bit cheaper for a nice one.
cant say i find anything built after the mk2 golf shape that appealing from a styling point of view and i cant say ive been that impressed with the build quality, the mk3 shape likes to rust doesnt it!
i had a 1800 mk3, probably 5 or 6 years ago to do up and sell on, it was covered in rust! the engine had done well though, sold it with 199k on the clock!
-
I was never really a fan and always wanted a mk1. I still do or maybe a mk2. I was about ready to buy my first car so needed to choose. Budget was around 2k and it needed to be some sort of vag motor. After much deliberation the mk3 came up trumps. Comfortable as i do alot of miles. Cheap enough to run and insure and can look sweet after a few simple mods.