Yes I had been comparing their example graph online to the one I've had. My bhp pushes a touch higher, granted at an 800rpm higher rev, but my torque takes a 40nm hit.
Both my torque and bhp climb considerably faster than their's in the 2,000-3,500rpm range, but the torque tapers off after that point. The bhp also has a much more gradual climb after that, all the way up to 7,300rpm, whereas their's cuts at 6,400.
From the stats I don't really know what to think of it.. It is worth mentioning that my map isn't identical to their's though. As their's is their own ECU tune, with TCU enhancements.
- I had a TVS stage 2 ECU and stage 2+ TCU, with recommended settings, which included raising rev limit.
- Then the TCU was tinkered with to remove the up/downshift and kickdown in manual, to have the rev count hiked slightly, and they did also try to remove the hard cut rev limiter, but said they couldn't do it.
- Then the ECU was essentially remapped again yesterday with their own tune, that they got around 385bhp for initially, but continued tweaking it until it hit 395.
I feel the tweaks to gain the bhp may have sacrificed some torque, and honestly I'm not sure whether I should be happy with that (and the high rev count peak power) or not.
It's not all that comparable, as its on a different dyno, but here's the results I had from the run a few weeks back, before they added their own map to the ECU yesterday.