The 245/35/18 is 6mm smaller in diameter than a 225/40/18,
Huh - actually more like 8 or 9mm difference in diameter! 4.5mm is the radius, and therefore the ride height!
(225/40 ZR18 has an overall dia of 637 to 645mm - depending upon manufacturer [Toyo or Mich], whereas 245/35 ZR18 has an OD of 629mm [Toyo])
take into account the squashing effect and they will be about the same.
WTF are you on about? If the load rating and the tyre pressures are the same, then the "squashing effect" will be identical, therefore the ride height will 4.5mm lower!
TBH, ive fitted 245 to a 7.5 rim before and i diddnt like the look..... each to there own though!!
Yup, agreed, ETTO.
And just to clarify, a 245 is NOT recommended for a 7.5" rim - with 8.0 to 9.5 being the recommended rim widths.
took them off wifes new tts cos the buffers on the side didnot protect the wheels u know what i mean 2 scuffed wheels in 2 days of picking it up.
The so called "rim protector" is a load of rubbish IMO. How is a small strip of rubber 3mm deep going to stop 1200kg of car from hitting a wheel on a kurb?
Ahhhh, but different tyre manufacturers use different methods of "rim protectors". Pirelli, along with most of the Jap and Korean tyres use the useless rubber "lip" mentioned. However, Michelin, the latest Continental, and Dunlop - all use the entire height of the sidewall as a rim protector. This method is noticably more useful than the pathetic 3mm lip still used by inferior tyre manufacturers.