I think the mod from dv52 regarding the front maybe illegal or an mot failure over here?
I would say they are illegal as you are indicating with the amber light and flashing with the DRL. I would like to see the insurance claim form explain that to the puzzled driver that pulls across anyone with it enabled. I had it on mine for about 5minutes along with the rears but the front's were taken off as just asking for trouble.
A better option would be the mirrors to flash in opposite phase to the front......
Yes that's what I was getting at I think it states that you not allowed to signal with anything other than an amber colour. This is why US cars over here have to have the red signalling lights changed
OK - isn't it interesting how some see the opposite to others? Both your views are that the counter blinking indicators are confusing, whereas my position is that the lighting arrangement reinforces the intention of the driver to turn in a particular direction. I've had the tweak implemented for quite a while now and my experience is that oncoming traffic has benefitted by my counter blinking arrangement - I've never had the impression that other drivers have been confused - if anything, I get the impression that they are clearer about my intention to turn. But hey, my intention is not to "sell" the tweak - you have raised legitimate concerns which should be considered by anyone before they proceed!
Interesting that your local rules are so specific about turn signals (i.e. they are so sophisticated that when written, they contemplated counter blinking/ unison blinking of multiple lamps), then definitely - don't implement the tweak!!
But I'm surprised that you left the rear tail tweak activated? Surely the same rules apply for the rear of the car - with the tail light tweak enabled, doesn't the red outer tail flashing with the amber turn signal light fall foul of the same, multi-indicator light rule?
