Author Topic: vr6 ?  (Read 10527 times)

Offline dam088888

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 473
vr6 ?
« on: 30 October 2011, 23:18 »
Hey mk3 lads currently own a mk4 1.8t just want to know what the mk3 vr6 are like in comparason

2000 agu 1.8t lowered 55mm,cream mirrors and wheels,stage 1 map, forge 007p,

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #1 on: 30 October 2011, 23:30 »
Stick with the 1.8t, better on fuel plus with a remap quicker and more torque.

Offline benvictors

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,172
  • bgk Tuning - coming soon!!!
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #2 on: 30 October 2011, 23:39 »
If you want a less tuneable, slower off the mark, older car that eats petrol then get yaself a VR................
All that said, i wouldn't swap my VR for a 1.8t, I love that noise and once turbo'd (coming soon  :shocked:) it will eat most 1.8t's out there  :laugh:

Offline tweed

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,379
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #3 on: 31 October 2011, 10:20 »
it's a weird one. mk4's are faster with a remap, better mpg.
but what one puts a huge smile on ya face? the mk3 vr6  :grin:

there is something about them and worth a try.

Untitled by tweedub, on Flickr

Offline AudiA8Quattro

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,773
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #4 on: 31 October 2011, 10:22 »
The 1.8T is overrated in my opinion.
FOR DIY GUIDES GO TO <br>www.volkswagenaudi.co.uk<br/>BRAKES, SUSPENSION, CV JOINTS

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #5 on: 31 October 2011, 10:42 »
The 1.8T is overrated in my opinion.

 :undecided: for noise a Vr wins hands down, bang for you buck wise a 1.8t is the better choice, remap gets you 200bhp or 220 if it is a 180 and not that expensive against the work / mods needed to get power out of a VR

Offline VR6_Wherry

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,940
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #6 on: 31 October 2011, 10:43 »
I was driving a while ago when some cool kid thought he would show off infront of his mates in his Mk4 1.8T and try to overtake me..

He was NOT Happy!  :grin: :grin:

Offline VR6_Wherry

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,940
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #7 on: 31 October 2011, 10:45 »
The 1.8T is overrated in my opinion.

 :undecided: for noise a Vr wins hands down, bang for you buck wise a 1.8t is the better choice, remap gets you 200bhp or 220 if it is a 180 and not that expensive against the work / mods needed to get power out of a VR

But in fairness mine produces 187.5bhp and 182lb/ft on the rollers and given the weight to power ration it can't be much different to a MK4 1.8T that's had a stage 1 map?

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #8 on: 31 October 2011, 11:03 »
The 1.8T is overrated in my opinion.

 :undecided: for noise a Vr wins hands down, bang for you buck wise a 1.8t is the better choice, remap gets you 200bhp or 220 if it is a 180 and not that expensive against the work / mods needed to get power out of a VR

But in fairness mine produces 187.5bhp and 182lb/ft on the rollers and given the weight to power ration it can't be much different to a MK4 1.8T that's had a stage 1 map?

From memory Dom's made 205bhp and 245lb/ft torque when first remapped, weight wise a mk4 cannot be that much heavier.

Not sure what mine is making, will try and find out soon. :smiley:

Offline stainesy

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,442
  • im not a master debater but i'm a cunning linguist
Re: vr6 ?
« Reply #9 on: 31 October 2011, 11:35 »
You Are all missing the main difference between the mk3 and the mk4.
The mk3 looks awesome in so many different mod styles and the mk4 is a big ugly fat arssed thing that pretty much looks the same no matter what you do to it.