GolfGTIforum.co.uk

General => General discussion => Topic started by: T_J_G on 14 January 2014, 10:28

Title: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: T_J_G on 14 January 2014, 10:28
(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7459/11945265596_26e6de542d_c.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/t_j_g/11945265596/)
Sunrise at Minster (http://www.flickr.com/photos/t_j_g/11945265596/) by T_J_G (http://www.flickr.com/people/t_j_g/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: DubFan on 14 January 2014, 11:45
Nice work.
Did you use an ND filter or were you able to get the longer exposure without?
Title: Re: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: T_J_G on 14 January 2014, 13:12
All I used was an ND grad for the sky, the light was low enough to allow a longish shutter speed to capture the movement.

Title: Re: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: kingzam on 26 March 2014, 13:23
That's a pretty nice picture man (I know I'm a bit late lol)
Title: Re: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: ajmoir36 on 28 March 2014, 20:58
That's a pretty nice picture man (I know I'm a bit late lol)

+1 :smiley:
Title: Re: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: dTEA on 06 April 2014, 21:17
Nice work.
Did you use an ND filter or were you able to get the longer exposure without?
Been a while since on here, but 0.4 is hardly a long exposure.  Simple to keep it tight at sunrise at that exposure
Title: Re: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: DubFan on 07 April 2014, 10:57
Nice work.
Did you use an ND filter or were you able to get the longer exposure without?
Been a while since on here, but 0.4 is hardly a long exposure.  Simple to keep it tight at sunrise at that exposure
I said "longer exposure", not long exposure, but it's longer than you can hand hold a shot.
It's a good exposure because it's got the blurred water at the bottom of the frame but there's still enough definition in the sea for it to show waves rather than just smooth water.
Title: Re: Sunrise at the beach
Post by: dTEA on 07 April 2014, 14:42
Nice work.
Did you use an ND filter or were you able to get the longer exposure without?
Been a while since on here, but 0.4 is hardly a long exposure.  Simple to keep it tight at sunrise at that exposure
I said "longer exposure", not long exposure, but it's longer than you can hand hold a shot.
It's a good exposure because it's got the blurred water at the bottom of the frame but there's still enough definition in the sea for it to show waves rather than just smooth water.
Fair enough just my mis-reading. My point was more around the fact its easy-ish to keep the shot balanced at that time of day without an ND.  ND and the exposure would have been at least 1-2 seconds i would of thought.  Nice shot still mind :afro: