Author Topic: Golf R32 are they really that bad????  (Read 14132 times)

Offline AlanD

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,009
  • MK5 2.0T 16v
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #20 on: 20 May 2010, 12:22 »
I'll admit to no 20v experience, but the 225bhp lump remapped must be up there power wise...can't be that expensive/difficult to swap the 225 bits over can it?

The 225 lump is diffrent to that of what you get in a MK4 GTI as its already got the KO4 turbo and manifold etc in it ( TT, S3 and Cupra). A remaped 225 is a diffrent kettle of fish.

Offline Adam

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,214
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #21 on: 20 May 2010, 12:25 »
This surprises me  :undecided:

R32 -
Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   237
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1512
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   159.26
0 - 60 (Secs) :   6.19
0 - 100 (Secs) :   17.47
60 - 100 (Secs) :   11.28
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.96
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   92.51
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.56
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :

1.8T Ko3s remapped to 220 -

Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   220
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1203
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   185.81
0 - 60 (Secs) :   6.00
0 - 100 (Secs) :   14.84
60 - 100 (Secs) :   8.84
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.38
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   98.43
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.18
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :   100.18

Down Hill From Here.

Offline haf1zur

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #22 on: 20 May 2010, 12:34 »
This surprises me  :undecided:

R32 -
Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   237
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1512
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   159.26
0 - 60 (Secs) :   6.19
0 - 100 (Secs) :   17.47
60 - 100 (Secs) :   11.28
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.96
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   92.51
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.56
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :

1.8T Ko3s remapped to 220 -

Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   220
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1203
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   185.81
0 - 60 (Secs) :   6.00
0 - 100 (Secs) :   14.84
60 - 100 (Secs) :   8.84
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.38
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   98.43
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.18
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :   100.18

if the ecu is upto date with 6463 its closer to 247

I am liking this

Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   265
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1373
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   196.11
0 - 60 (Secs) :   5.09
0 - 100 (Secs) :   13.78
60 - 100 (Secs) :   8.69
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   13.82
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   100.15
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   13.42
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :   103.32
« Last Edit: 20 May 2010, 12:37 by haf1zur »

Offline A7 UFO

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,052
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #23 on: 20 May 2010, 12:38 »
This surprises me  :undecided:
what does?  The fact that the 20v is faster?

I'm not surprised as my 175bhp/150lbs 2.0 16v mk2 was faster than a 240bhp rallye.  Weight counts for a lot.

Offline Adam

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,214
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #24 on: 20 May 2010, 12:41 »
This surprises me  :undecided:
what does?  The fact that the 20v is faster?

I'm not surprised as my 175bhp/150lbs 2.0 16v mk2 was faster than a 240bhp rallye.  Weight counts for a lot.

Yea. More so the weight of the R32 but suppose it does have to lug that 4wd and 2 extra cylinders.

Down Hill From Here.

Offline nickvw

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 371
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #25 on: 20 May 2010, 12:49 »
I've had my R32 for 20 months now and absolutely love it, fair enough  they are pricey to buy and at the pumps but i think they are worth it obviously or i wouldnt have bought one  :tongue:

Over the last 2000 miles my average fuel consumption has been 26 mpg, thats a mixture of town motorway and weekend thrash, tbh i have looked into changing for a mk5 gti for the same money as mines worth mainly due to the fuel but when i worked it out i would save about £7 a week so not really worth it to me.

It's not all about power figures anyway it's down to how it drives and although the R32 is a heavy car it can still shift and the power is instant and totally smooth, i went round a roundabout the other day whilst being lazy and left it in 6th at 25mph and it still pulled smoothly out the other side.

I had wnted one for a long time before a bought mine and i will never regret it one bit it's an awesome car and if i were to think about changing now it would more than likely be a mk5 R32 that replaced it.

These are just my views from a unbiased R32 owner haha  :grin:

Offline Hulmie

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,287
  • White MK4 1.8T AGU K03s
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #26 on: 20 May 2010, 12:56 »
This surprises me  :undecided:

R32 -
Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   237
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1512
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   159.26
0 - 60 (Secs) :   6.19
0 - 100 (Secs) :   17.47
60 - 100 (Secs) :   11.28
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.96
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   92.51
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.56
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :

1.8T Ko3s remapped to 220 -

Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   220
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1203
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   185.81
0 - 60 (Secs) :   6.00
0 - 100 (Secs) :   14.84
60 - 100 (Secs) :   8.84
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.38
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   98.43
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   14.18
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :   100.18

if the ecu is upto date with 6463 its closer to 247

I am liking this

Power at Flywheel (BHP) :   265
Weight without Driver (KG) :   1373
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :   196.11
0 - 60 (Secs) :   5.09
0 - 100 (Secs) :   13.78
60 - 100 (Secs) :   8.69
Quarter Mile (Secs) :   13.82
Terminal Speed (MPH) :   100.15
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :   13.42
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :   103.32


Where are these figures from? Using what map/mods etc?

Im interested as my car is supposed to be 230bhp on the rollers so kind of gives me an idea of what 1/4 mile run it should do.


mk4 R32 Golf, Reflex Silver, V6

Offline haf1zur

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #27 on: 20 May 2010, 12:56 »
i'd take all the figures with a pinch of salt, well quite a big pinch actually

reason being stock r32 did 13.9 1/4

albeit with weight reduction

Offline haf1zur

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #28 on: 20 May 2010, 13:00 »

Where are these figures from? Using what map/mods etc?

Im interested as my car is supposed to be 230bhp on the rollers so kind of gives me an idea of what 1/4 mile run it should do.

http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculator.asp

Offline Ivor Mk4 Turbo

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,576
  • 2014 PP GTi Manual
Re: Golf R32 are they really that bad????
« Reply #29 on: 20 May 2010, 14:09 »
Hehe, I love these threads.......................

My old 227 bhp/256 lb ft 1.8 T outran a standard R32 on a DC (was a dry road though, obviously).

I would still have the DBP R32 over my old GTI, anyday.  The sound.........................  The looks............................  The feel-good-factor/kudos etc.
Current Car:- 2014 GTI PP manual, white.

Make way for..... 'The Silver Bullet'! 227 bhp, KO3-S'd AGU, R-TECH Spec 2 map 8), Forge 007P, Blueflame Turbo-back, Eibach -30mm's, YellowStuff front/RedStuff rear pads, Goodridge braided lines, TT Short-shifter, R32 Dogbone, TT W/B bushes, Forge TIP, G60 fly/VR6 clutch, 5.5 ltr washer bottle,

Car now for sale >>> http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=140614.0